Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates

Landerer, F. W., Swenson, S. C.·2012·Water Resources Research

Abstract

We assess the accuracy of global‐gridded terrestrial water storage (TWS) estimates derived from temporal gravity field variations observed by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites. The TWS data set has been corrected for signal modification due to filtering and truncation. Simulations of terrestrial water storage variations from land‐hydrology models are used to infer relationships between regional time series representing different spatial scales. These relationships, which are independent of the actual GRACE data, are used to extrapolate the GRACE TWS estimates from their effective spatial resolution (length scales of a few hundred kilometers) to finer spatial scales (∼100 km). Gridded, scaled data like these enable users who lack expertise in processing and filtering the standard GRACE spherical harmonic geopotential coefficients to estimate the time series of TWS over arbitrarily shaped regions. In addition, we provide gridded fields of leakage and GRACE measurement errors that allow users to rigorously estimate the associated regional TWS uncertainties. These fields are available for download from the GRACE project website (available at http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov ). Three scaling relationships are examined: a single gain factor based on regionally averaged time series, spatially distributed (i.e., gridded) gain factors based on time series at each grid point, and gridded‐gain factors estimated as a function of temporal frequency. While regional gain factors have typically been used in previously published studies, we find that comparable accuracies can be obtained from scaled time series based on gridded gain factors. In regions where different temporal modes of TWS variability have significantly different spatial scales, gain factors based on the first two methods may reduce the accuracy of the scaled time series. In these cases, gain factors estimated separately as a function of frequency may be necessary to achieve accurate results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2011wr011453

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1007/s00190‐006‐0104‐2 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/ngeo694 · DOI
  3. 10.1029/2010GL046442 · DOI
  4. 10.5194/hess-11-1227-2007 · DOI
  5. 10.1029/2010JD014584 · DOI
  6. 10.1029/2007JG000563 · DOI
  7. 10.1029/2004GL020873 · DOI
  8. 10.1175/BAMS-85-3-381 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature08238 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/2010EO100008 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.11.018 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00190‐004‐0410‐5 · DOI
  13. 10.1175/2009JHM1194.1 · DOI
  14. 10.1029/2001JB000576 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2005GL025285 · DOI
  16. 10.1029/2007GL030733 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365‐246X.2011.04977.x · DOI
  18. 10.1029/2002WR001808 · DOI
  19. 10.1175/2009JHM1152.1 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/2009GL040222 · DOI
  21. 10.1029/98JB02844 · DOI
  22. 10.1029/2005GL025305 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,219

Metadata

Authors
Landerer, F. W., & Swenson, S. C.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2012-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0043-1397
  • 1944-7973
Cited by
1,219
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2011wr011453
The paper
Landerer, F. W., & Swenson, S. C. (2012). Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr011453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.