Cited by 585Hydrology and Drought AnalysisPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsClimate variability and models

Plant responses to increasing CO 2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity

Open access
Swann, Abigail L. S., Hoffman, Forrest M., Koven, Charles D., Randerson, James T.·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: We show that the water savings that plants experience under high CO 2 conditions compensate for much of the effect of warmer temperatures, keeping the amount of water on land, on average, higher than we would predict with common drought metrics, and with a different spatial pattern. The implications of plants needing less water under high CO 2 reaches beyond drought prediction to the assessment of climate change impacts on agriculture, water resources, wildfire risk, and vegetation dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1604581113

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even if higher CO2 lessens drought stress via plant responses, warming probably will dry fuels faster and raise risk where people commonly ignite fires.

    “Although plant physiological responses to rising CO2 may reduce some drought stress (46), climate change will likely lead to faster desiccation of fuels and increased risk in areas where human ignitions are prevalent.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Pendergrass AG, Hartmann DL (2013) The atmospheric energy constraint on globalmean precipitation change. J Clim 27(2):757 -768.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swann, A. L. S., Hoffman, F. M., Koven, C. D., & Randerson, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
113
Issue
36
Pages
10019-10024
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2515280555
Cited by
585
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
38.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (AGS-1321745, EF-1340649)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
atmospheric CO2 increase, drought severity, stomatal conductance, plant transpiration, precipitation minus evapotranspiration, Palmer Drought Severity Index, Earth system model output, soil moisture, drought indices, precipitation decrease
MeSH terms
Asia, Atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide, Europe, Models, Biological, Photosynthesis, Soil, South America, Water, Ecosystem, Plant Leaves, Plant Transpiration, Droughts, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review