The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global modeling study of potentially bioavailable iron input from shipboard aerosol sources to the ocean
Abstract
Iron (Fe) is an essential element for phytoplankton. The majority of iron is transported from arid and semiarid regions to the open ocean, but it is mainly in an insoluble form. Since most aquatic organisms can take up iron only in the dissolved form, aerosol iron solubility is a key factor that can influence the air‐sea CO 2 fluxes and thus climate. Field observations have shown relatively high iron solubility in aerosols influenced by combustion sources, but specific emissions sources and their contributions to deposition fluxes largely remain uncertain. Here a global chemical transport model was used to investigate the effect of aerosol emissions from ship plumes on iron solubility in particles from the combustion and dust sources. The model results reveal that the oil combustion from shipping mainly contributes to high iron solubility (>10%) at low iron loading (1–110 ng m–3) observed over the high‐latitude North Atlantic Ocean, rather than the other combustion sources from continental industrialized regions. Due to continuing growth in global shipping and no regulations regarding particles emissions over the open ocean, the input of potentially bioavailable iron from ship plumes is likely to increase during the next century. The model results suggest that deposition of soluble iron from ships in 2100 contributes 30–60% of the soluble iron deposition over the high‐latitude North Atlantic and North Pacific.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lamarque, J.-F., Bond, T. C., Eyring, V., Granier, C., Heil, A., Klimont, Z., Lee, D., Liousse, C., Mieville, A., Owen, B., et al. (2010) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-10-7017-2010 · Cited by 2,105 · cited 1×
“The spatial allocation of anthropogenic emissions of FF use from each sector follows the grids generated for the IPCC Fifth Assessment (AR5) report [ Lamarque et al ., 2010].”
Cited by
Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink.
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E., & Schuster, U. (2014) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2014gb004853 · Cited by 524
Achat, D. L., Deleuze, C., Landmann, G., Pousse, N., Ranger, J., & Augusto, L. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042 · Cited by 353
Zhu, J., He, N., Wang, Q., Yuan, G., Wen, D., Yu, G., & Jia, Y. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.038 · Cited by 351
Jia, Y., Yu, G., He, N., Zhan, X., Fang, H., Sheng, W., Zuo, Y., Zhang, D., & Wang, Q. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03763 · Cited by 306
Pyrogenic iron: the missing link to high iron solubility in aerosols
Ito, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Kanakidou, M., Mahowald, N. M., Scanza, R. A., Hamilton, D. S., Baker, A. R., Jickells, T., Sarin, M., Bikkina, S., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau7671 · Cited by 251
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ito, A.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-01-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1521371173
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global modeling study of potentially bioavailable iron input from shipboard aerosol sources to the ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2012gb004378
- The paper
- Ito, A. (2013). Global modeling study of potentially bioavailable iron input from shipboard aerosol sources to the ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gb004378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.