Correlation of ignimbrites using characteristic remanent magnetization and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, Central Andes, Bolivia
Abstract
Large ignimbrite flare‐ups provide records of profound crustal modification during batholith formation at depth. The locations of source calderas and volumes and ages of the eruptions must be determined to develop models for the tectonomagmatic processes that occur during these events. Although high‐precision isotopic ages of the ignimbrites are critical, less expensive and more rapid techniques, such as paleomagnetism, can extend the temporal information from dated outcrops. Paleomagnetic and rock magnetic data, including characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), from the Altiplano‐Puna Volcanic Complex of the Central Andes reliably identify calderas and eight associated Mio‐Pliocene ignimbrites. ChRM results indicate a larger between‐site error for most ignimbrites, in comparison to within‐site scatter. Part of this dispersion may be due to tumescence/detumescence associated with the caldera‐forming eruptions, but most of the effect is probably due to the recording of paleosecular variation during cooling and vapor‐phase crystallization of the thick ignimbrites. AMS data identify the source calderas for four ignimbrites and provide limits on possible post‐emplacement rotations of the deposits. AMS data indicate significant topographic control on inferred flow directions, implying that the flows were dense and/or of low mobility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distribution of different rock types in the catchment can be linked to the potential amount of lithium in the magmatic system.
“This can then be linked to the phases of magmatic activity and evolution of the catchment geology, including the distribution of different rock types, which in turn can be linked to the potential amount of lithium in the magmatic system [47].”
From Framework for remote sensing and modelling of lithium-brine deposit formation (2022) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Ort, M. H., de Silva, S. L., Jiménez C., N., Jicha, B. R., & Singer, B. S.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- CEOAS Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA
- Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas y del Medio Ambiente Universidad Mayor de San Andrés La Paz Bolivia
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
- Corresponding author
- Ort, Michael H.
- Venue
- Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-157
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1591263265
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
- Keywords
- ignimbrites, ignimbrite flare-up, characteristic remanent magnetization, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, Altiplano-Puna Volcanic Complex, paleosecular variation, flow direction, Central Andes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review