The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the Earth surface
Open accessAbstract
Lithology describes the geochemical, mineralogical, and physical properties of rocks. It plays a key role in many processes at the Earth surface, especially the fluxes of matter to soils, ecosystems, rivers, and oceans. Understanding these processes at the global scale requires a high resolution description of lithology. A new high resolution global lithological map (GLiM) was assembled from existing regional geological maps translated into lithological information with the help of regional literature. The GLiM represents the rock types of the Earth surface with 1,235,400 polygons. The lithological classification consists of three levels. The first level contains 16 lithological classes comparable to previously applied definitions in global lithological maps. The additional two levels contain 12 and 14 subclasses, respectively, which describe more specific rock attributes. According to the GLiM, the Earth is covered by 64% sediments (a third of which are carbonates), 13% metamorphics, 7% plutonics, and 6% volcanics, and 10% are covered by water or ice. The high resolution of the GLiM allows observation of regional lithological distributions which often vary from the global average. The GLiM enables regional analysis of Earth surface processes at global scales. A gridded version of the GLiM is available at the PANGEA Database (http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.788537).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Amiotte Suchet, P., Probst, J., & Ludwig, W. (2003) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2002gb001891 · Cited by 606
Storage and release of fossil organic carbon related to weathering of sedimentary rocks
Copard, Y., Amiotte-Suchet, P., & Di-Giovanni, C. (2007) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.03.048 · Cited by 88
Atmospheric CO2 consumption by chemical weathering in North America
Moosdorf, N., Hartmann, J., Lauerwald, R., Hagedorn, B., & Kempe, S. (2011) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.007 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Cited by
SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 · Cited by 4,733
SoilGrids1km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping
Hengl, T., de Jesus, J. M., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ribeiro, E., Samuel-Rosa, A., Kempen, B., Leenaars, J. G. B., Walsh, M. G., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105992 · Cited by 1,268
Carbon dioxide storage through mineral carbonation
Snæbjörnsdóttir, S. Ó., Sigfússon, B., Marieni, C., Goldberg, D., Gislason, S. R., & Oelkers, E. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-019-0011-8 · Cited by 977
The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater
Gleeson, T., Befus, K. M., Jasechko, S., Luijendijk, E., & Cardenas, M. B. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2590 · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, J., & Moosdorf, N.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133505387
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.