The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of confinement on reaction-induced fracturing during hydration of periclase
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Hydration of a nominally dry rock can cause expansion of the solid volume, resulting in reaction‐induced fracturing and an associated increase in the porosity and permeability of the rock. We study the effect of confinement on the coupling between stress generation, reaction‐induced fracturing, and porosity evolution during the hydration of periclase (MgO) into brucite (Mg(OH)2). Samples of a microporous MgO ceramic were hydrated at 170–210 °C, 5–80 MPa confining pressure, 6–95 MPa differential stress, and 5–75 MPa pore fluid pressure in a purpose‐designed triaxial load cell. Hydration‐induced changes were recorded in situ by X‐ray microtomographic imaging at 5‐min intervals. Below 30 MPa effective mean stress, the fraction of periclase replaced by brucite is a sigmoidal function of time. After a slow start, the replacement rate picks up with concomitant intense fracturing. The porosity increase resulting from the reaction‐induced fractures is transient (pulse‐like). Following the porosity pulse the rate of replacement declines until the replacement is almost complete. Above 30 MPa, the reaction rate is slow, porosity decreases monotonically without any observable fracturing during the time of the experiment. At these stress conditions, the lack of fracturing cannot be limited by the thermodynamic affinity of the reaction. A possible interpretation is that the stress generated by the reaction may overcome the disjoining pressure at the grain‐grain interface, expelling the water film trapped there and thereby dramatically reducing the reaction rate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At this scale, nanofluidic transport phenomena can be significant and effectively govern metamorphic fluid-flow, mass transport and hence carbon mineralization.
“At this scale, nanofluidic transport phenomena can be significant and effectively govern metamorphic fluid-flow, mass transport and hence carbon mineralization (Plümper et al., 2017a; Zheng et al., 2018).”
From Ultramafic Rock Carbonation: Constraints From Listvenite Core BT1B, Oman Drilling Project (2020) · cites this paper as Zheng et al., 2018
The analog experiments of Zheng et al. (2018) illustrate the efficacy of reaction-driven cracking under the right conditions.
“The analog experiments of Zheng et al. (2018) illustrate the efficacy of reaction-driven cracking under the right conditions.”
From An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations (2019) · cites this paper as Zheng et al. (2018)
Citations
Cites
In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO 2 storage
Kelemen, P. B., & Matter, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805794105 · Cited by 750
Experimental evidence of reaction‐induced fracturing during olivine carbonation
Zhu, W., Fusseis, F., Lisabeth, H., Xing, T., Xiao, X., De Andrade, V., & Karato, S. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl070834 · Cited by 120
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1029/97JB00996 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1750380 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.827 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021‐9797(74)90358‐0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.055 · DOI
- 10.1130/G33286.1 · DOI
- 10.1021/es300403n · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7185/geochempersp.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00410‐008‐0324‐y · DOI
- Johnson M. C., 1993, Brucite [Mg(OH)2] dehydration and the molar volume of H2O to 15 GPa, American Mineralogist, 78, 271
- 10.1021/ja01143a062 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.018 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev‐earth‐092010‐152509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00710‐015‐0414‐2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00269‐016‐0857‐y · DOI
- 10.1029/2008GC002358 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040‐1951(85)90225‐2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.07.042 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JB002582 · DOI
- 10.2747/0020‐6814.49.5.401 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.09.018 · DOI
- 10.2113/gselements.4.5.333 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091‐7613(1992)020<0705:STTVPI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1107/S1600577516008730 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016‐7037(97)00036‐7 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013GC005148 · DOI
- 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.02 · DOI
- 10.1209/0295‐5075/96/24003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0008‐8846(99)00002‐2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.034 · DOI
- Sprunt E. S. &Brace W.(1974).Direct observation of microcavities in crystalline rocks. Paper presented at the International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JB011102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.039 · DOI
- Wicks F., 1977, Serpentine textures and serpentinization, Canadian Mineralogist, 15, 459
- 10.1007/s11440‐017‐0533‐5 · DOI
- 10.1029/94JB00647 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587
Ultramafic Rock Carbonation: Constraints From Listvenite Core BT1B, Oman Drilling Project
Beinlich, A., Plümper, O., Boter, E., Müller, I. A., Kourim, F., Ziegler, M., Harigane, Y., Lafay, R., Kelemen, P. B., & the Oman Drilling Project Science Team (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2019jb019060 · Cited by 85
In situ carbon mineralization in ultramafic rocks: natural processes and possible engineered methods
Kelemen, P. B., Aines, R., Bennett, E., Benson, S. M., Carter, E., Coggon, J. A., de Obeso, J. C., Evans, O., Gadikota, G., Dipple, G. M., et al. (2018) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.013 · Cited by 74
Monasterio-Guillot, L., Fernandez-Martinez, A., Ruiz-Agudo, E., & Rodriguez-Navarro, C. (2021) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2021.02.016 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, X., Cordonnier, B., Zhu, W., Renard, F., & Jamtveit, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- The Njord Centre, Physics of Geological Processes, Department of Geosciences University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Xiaojiao
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2661-2672
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2883910589
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing, National Science Foundation (EAR‐1551300)
- H2020 European Research Council (669972)
- Norges Forskningsråd (250661)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Rock Mechanics and Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
- Keywords
- brucite, confining pressure, porosity evolution, permeability, stress generation, disjoining pressure, water film, in situ X-ray microtomography, triaxial loading, fluid-rock interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review