The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and Evolution of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics in Convection‐Permitting Simulations Over the United States
Open accessAbstract
Regional climate simulations over the continental United States were conducted for the 2011 warm season using the Weather Research and Forecasting model at convection‐permitting resolution (4 km) with two commonly used microphysics parameterizations (Thompson and Morrison). Sensitivities of the simulated mesoscale convective system (MCS) properties and feedbacks to large‐scale environments are systematically examined against high‐resolution geostationary satellite and 3‐D mosaic radar observations. MCS precipitation including precipitation amount, diurnal cycle, and distribution of hourly precipitation intensity are reasonably captured by the two simulations despite significant differences in their simulated MCS properties. In general, the Thompson simulation produces better agreement with observations for MCS upper level cloud shield and precipitation area, convective feature horizontal and vertical extents, and partitioning between convective and stratiform precipitation. More importantly, Thompson simulates more stratiform rainfall, which agrees better with observations and results in top‐heavier heating profiles from robust MCSs compared to Morrison. A stronger dynamical feedback to the large‐scale environment is therefore seen in Thompson, wherein an enhanced mesoscale vortex behind the MCS strengthens the synoptic‐scale trough and promotes advection of cool and dry air into the rear of the MCS region. The latter prolongs the MCS lifetimes in the Thompson relative to the Morrison simulations. Hence, different treatment of cloud microphysics not only alters MCS convective‐scale dynamics but also has significant impacts on their macrophysical properties such as lifetime and precipitation. As long‐lived MCSs produced 2–3 times the amount of rainfall compared to short‐lived ones, cloud microphysics parameterizations have profound impact in simulating extreme precipitation and the hydrologic cycle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D. M., Wang, W., Huang, X., & Duda, M. (2008) · UCAR/NCAR · doi:10.5065/d68s4mvh · Cited by 8,925
A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., & Dudhia, J. (2006) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr3199.1 · Cited by 7,154
North American Regional Reanalysis
Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jović, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., et al. (2006) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-87-3-343 · Cited by 3,378
Thompson, G., Field, P. R., Rasmussen, R. M., & Hall, W. D. (2008) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/2008mwr2387.1 · Cited by 3,156
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504
Morrison, H., Thompson, G., & Tatarskii, V. (2009) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/2008mwr2556.1 · Cited by 2,438
Houze, R. A. (2004) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2004rg000150 · Cited by 1,494
Self-citationPrein, A. F., Langhans, W., Fosser, G., Ferrone, A., Ban, N., Goergen, K., Keller, M., Tölle, M., Gutjahr, O., Feser, F., et al. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000475 · Cited by 1,445
Morrison, H., Curry, J. A., & Khvorostyanov, V. I. (2005) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas3446.1 · Cited by 1,176
Thompson, G., Rasmussen, R. M., & Manning, K. (2004) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:efowpu>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,159
Cited by
Blunden, J., & Arndt, D. S. (2019) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/2019bamsstateoftheclimate.1 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, Z., Leung, L. R., Houze, R. A., Hagos, S., Hardin, J., Yang, Q., Han, B., & Fan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1470-1494
- ISSN
- 1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809133793
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Evolution of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics in Convection‐Permitting Simulations Over the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2018ms001305
- The paper
- Feng, Z., Leung, L. R., Houze, R. A., Hagos, S., Hardin, J., Yang, Q., Han, B., & Fan, J. (2018). Structure and Evolution of Mesoscale Convective Systems: Sensitivity to Cloud Microphysics in Convection‐Permitting Simulations Over the United States. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.