The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis and Mapping of an Updated Terrestrial Heat Flow Data Set
Open accessAbstract
The number of heat flow measurements at the Earth surface has significantly increased since the last global analysis (Pollack et al., 1993, https://doi.org/10.1029/93RG01249), and the most recent of them provide insights into key locations. This paper presents a new compilation, which includes approximately 70,000 measurements. Continental heat flow (67 mWm−2) does not change significantly, but the differences are more important for oceanic heat flow. The divergence with conductive cooling models is reduced significantly for young ages of the seafloor, since the most recent measurements (92 mWm−2) are significantly higher on average than the older ones (79 mWm−2). This is related to a better quality and a better sampling of measurements in regions affected by hydrothermal circulation. The total Earth heat loss derived from these most recent measurements is estimated to ∼40–42 TW and represents only 3–5 TW less than with a conductive cooling model (∼45–47 TW). Hydrothermal heat loss in the oceanic domain is estimated with a new method based on the ruggedness of the seafloor and represents ∼1.5 TW more than previous estimates. The heat flow variability on continents is so large that defining a trend with stratigraphic or tectono‐thermal age is difficult and makes extrapolation from age a poor predictor. On the other hand, additional geological and geophysical information can be combined with age for better predictions. A generalized similarity method was used here to predict heat flow on a global 0.5° × 0.5° grid. The agreement with local measurements is generally good and increases with the number and quality of proxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released
Wessel, P., Smith, W. H. F., Scharroo, R., Luis, J., & Wobbe, F. (2013) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1002/2013eo450001 · Cited by 3,935
An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age
Parsons, B., & Sclater, J. G. (1977) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb082i005p00803 · Cited by 2,821
Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world's ocean crust
Müller, R. D., Sdrolias, M., Gaina, C., & Roest, W. R. (2008) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2007gc001743 · Cited by 2,065
Heat flow from the Earth's interior: Analysis of the global data set
Pollack, H. N., Hurter, S. J., & Johnson, J. R. (1993) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/93rg01249 · Cited by 1,593
A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age
Stein, C. A., & Stein, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359123a0 · Cited by 1,515
The heat flow through oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss of the Earth
Sclater, J. G., Jaupart, C., & Galson, D. (1980) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/rg018i001p00269 · Cited by 1,203
Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust
Laske, G., Masters, G., Ma, Z., & Pasyanos, M. E. (2013) · EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · Cited by 1,164
Wilson, M. F. J., O’Connell, B., Brown, C., Guinan, J. C., & Grehan, A. J. (2007) · Marine Geodesy · doi:10.1080/01490410701295962 · Cited by 986
Thermal structure of oceanic and continental lithosphere
MCKENZIE, D., JACKSON, J., & PRIESTLEY, K. (2005) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.005 · Cited by 897
Sandwell, D. T., & Smith, W. H. F. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2008jb006008 · Cited by 827
Cited by
Geological controls on geothermal resources for power generation
Jolie, E., Scott, S., Faulds, J., Chambefort, I., Axelsson, G., Gutiérrez-Negrín, L. C., Regenspurg, S., Ziegler, M., Ayling, B., Richter, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00154-y · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucazeau, F.
- Venue
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4001-4024
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965785417
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 31.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis and Mapping of an Updated Terrestrial Heat Flow Data Set. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2019gc008389
- The paper
- Lucazeau, F. (2019). Analysis and Mapping of an Updated Terrestrial Heat Flow Data Set. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gc008389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.