The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS‐1 altimetry: Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate
Abstract
Three approaches are used to reduce the error in the satellite‐derived marine gravity anomalies. First, we have retracked the raw waveforms from the ERS‐1 and Geosat/GM missions resulting in improvements in range precision of 40% and 27%, respectively. Second, we have used the recently published EGM2008 global gravity model as a reference field to provide a seamless gravity transition from land to ocean. Third, we have used a biharmonic spline interpolation method to construct residual vertical deflection grids. Comparisons between shipboard gravity and the global gravity grid show errors ranging from 2.0 mGal in the Gulf of Mexico to 4.0 mGal in areas with rugged seafloor topography. The largest errors of up to 20 mGal occur on the crests of narrow large seamounts. The global spreading ridges are well resolved and show variations in ridge axis morphology and segmentation with spreading rate. For rates less than about 60 mm/a the typical ridge segment is 50–80 km long while it increases dramatically at higher rates (100–1000 km). This transition spreading rate of 60 mm/a also marks the transition from axial valley to axial high. We speculate that a single mechanism controls both transitions; candidates include both lithospheric and asthenospheric processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Korenaga, J. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2006jb004502 · Cited by 172
Cited by
The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008)
Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2011jb008916 · Cited by 2,641
Global continental and ocean basin reconstructions since 200Ma
Seton, M., Müller, R. D., Zahirovic, S., Gaina, C., Torsvik, T., Shephard, G., Talsma, A., Gurnis, M., Turner, M., Maus, S., et al. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.03.002 · Cited by 1,908
Late Jurassic–Cenozoic reconstructions of the Indonesian region and the Indian Ocean
Hall, R. (2012) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2012.04.021 · Cited by 1,078
Analysis and Mapping of an Updated Terrestrial Heat Flow Data Set
Lucazeau, F. (2019) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1029/2019gc008389 · Cited by 331
Australia–SE Asia collision: plate tectonics and crustal flow
Hall, R. (2011) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/sp355.5 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandwell, D. T., & Smith, W. H. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- B1
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081696323
- Cited by
- 827
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS‐1 altimetry: Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jb006008
- The paper
- Sandwell, D. T., & Smith, W. H. F. (2009). Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS‐1 altimetry: Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb006008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.