The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Four Theories of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation
Open accessAbstract
Studies of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) have progressed considerably during the past decades in observations, numerical modeling, and theoretical understanding. Many theoretical attempts have been made to identify the most essential processes responsible for the existence of the MJO. Criteria are proposed to separate a hypothesis from a theory (based on the first principles with quantitative and testable assumptions, able to predict quantitatively the fundamental scales and eastward propagation of the MJO). Four MJO theories are selected to be summarized and compared in this article: the skeleton theory, moisture‐mode theory, gravity‐wave theory, and trio‐interaction theory of the MJO. These four MJO theories are distinct from each other in their key assumptions, parameterized processes, and, particularly, selection mechanisms for the zonal spatial scale, time scale, and eastward propagation of the MJO. The comparison of the four theories and more recent development in MJO dynamical approaches lead to a realization that theoretical thinking of the MJO is diverse and understanding of MJO dynamics needs to be further advanced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Work on predictions of compound extremes is still in its infancy.
“While AI research has examined individual extreme events (Section 2), work on predictions of compound extremes is still in its infancy (Zhang et al., 2020).”
From Artificial intelligence for climate prediction of extremes: State of the art, challenges, and future perspectives (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2020
The Introduction discusses the prediction of the Madden–Julian Oscillation and a gap between its current prediction skill and predictability limit. Searches for compound extremes, compound extreme events, and extreme-weather predictability found no passage assessing whether prediction research on compound extremes is in its infancy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 256 · Cited by 209
Research works printed but not linked: 241
- 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0242.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0170.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017MS000913 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017MS001040 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0091.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0003.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0232.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0333.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015GL066957 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-017-3558-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013GL058187 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00168.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0676:TROTTA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015MS000498 · DOI
- 10.1175/2009JCLI2392.1 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511814921 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0240.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3968.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49711247308 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49711247307 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3455.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2922:TIOIAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3614.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1517:RBWVPA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2760:VOMMAI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0901:VIGWAL>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<1709:KWCAPM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1940:OTOOTT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0896:TROSFI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0607:ANOLSM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0446.1 · DOI
- Chen G., 2018, Dynamic moisture mode versus moisture mode in MJO dynamics: Importance of the wave feedback and boundary layer convergence feedback, Climate Dynamics, 52
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00196.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<1380:MVODCI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-13-038.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<1693:AANMOW>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00384.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00832.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014RG000478 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017JD026526 · DOI
- 10.1256/qj.03.130 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<0064:DOTSMB>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/grl.50308 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49712051902 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3960:TBOASH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2324:AASIMO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0085.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2373:TFBECA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2761:GOIOAE>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.4310/CMS.2004.v2.n4.a3 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1669:LSMOAN>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3582.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00230.x · DOI
- 10.1002/2017MS000963 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016GL072430 · DOI
- 10.1175/2010BAMS2816.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0300.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<3058:TIOAIA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<3909:RCEWET>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2909:TIDOOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2225:TLCOTM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/2008JAS2806.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GL072832 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3058:COTPWP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<0823:TIOATR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00310.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<1089:LFOIRC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0478:LFOIRC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00541.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-19-0209.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0092.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0379.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016JD025955 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0671.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JD022375 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016GL070898 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0202.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<3086:TROLLM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-017-3807-6 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0780:TOOCIT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JD032142 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-18-0152.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3677.1 · DOI
- 10.4310/CMS.2010.v8.n1.a10 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0152.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-013-1949-8 · DOI
- Kikuchi K., 2017, Convectively coupled equatorial waves within the MJO during CINDY/DYNAMO: Slow Kelvin waves as building blocks, Climate Dynamics, 50, 1
- 10.1029/2004GL019601 · DOI
- 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00301.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3520.1 · DOI
- Kiladis G. N., 2009, Convectively coupled equatorial waves, Reviews of Geophysics, 47
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00767.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GL072643 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00084.1 · DOI
- 10.1142/9789813200913_0009 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011MS000081 · DOI
- 10.1175/2011JCLI4177.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/2009JCLI3063.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0862.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017JD027005 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00480.1 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011JD016031 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<0605:GSIOOO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/2007JAS2444.1 · DOI
- Kundu P. K., 2012, Fluid mechanics
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1232:FSOTPO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0950:OOLFOI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<2023:TSAPOI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2151/jmsj.81.963 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-014-2461-5 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2050:RBOTTI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2793:MOTIVI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3367:HMAROT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0156:WCITT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0283.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GL073891 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JD021876 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0116.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-011-1281-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-016-3090-y · DOI
- 10.1002/2016GL067702 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0702:DOADOI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1109:DOGSCC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0401034101 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.2008.0012 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0903367106 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-11-053.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/2008JCLI2542.1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41558-018-0331-6 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<2387:FMCIAC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-18-0179.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00037.1 · DOI
- 10.2151/jmsj1965.44.1_25 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/qj.49712656902 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.224 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49712555702 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2188:AAOFFO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009GL039667 · DOI
- 10.2151/jmsj1965.70.1B_191 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3269:CTWFTM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0929:TDWVAC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2151/jmsj1965.66.6_823 · DOI
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016, Next generation Earth System prediction: Strategies for subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<0003:MTCBOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<2341:EWFALF>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<1876:MOTVUC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0205.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.2552 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.1923 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI3534.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0326.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JD022961 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0119.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0790.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013GL057998 · DOI
- 10.1175/2008JAS2701.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3945:ROMCOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.49712656406 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<2807:ANMOTM>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00268.x · DOI
- 10.1175/2008JCLI2739.1 · DOI
- 10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.9 · DOI
- 10.1175/2007JAS2345.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-12-03.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0437.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0458:TRTLEH>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2344:PSCITP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2207:IBOCTA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018MS001441 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00231106 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-11-0118.1 · DOI
- 10.1038/ngeo312 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-12-0189.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0052.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<4378:MTPIAS>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<3650:TWTGAA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0620.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<3018:PATVSO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003820050197 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0254.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015JD023916 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GL075754 · DOI
- 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00169.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00162-012-0268-8 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0030:ERFABL>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/2008JAS2690.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.2264 · DOI
- 10.1515/mcwf-2015-0004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-015-2731-x · DOI
- 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0263.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS-D-13-0186.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00382-014-2256-8 · DOI
- 10.1175/JAS3782.1 · DOI
- 10.2151/jmsj1965.66.6_883 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.623 · DOI
- 10.1175/BAMS-84-1-33 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<2051:DOTLFW>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3521:COAIMO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Wang B., 2012, Intraseasonal variability in the atmosphere‐ocean climate system, 335
- 10.1007/s00382-016-3448-1 · DOI
200 of 241 shown
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Adames, Á. F., Khouider, B., Wang, B., & Yang, D.
- Affiliations
- NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, C.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2020-07-21
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e2019RG000685-e2019RG000685
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- PMC
- PMC7375192
- OpenAlex
- W3021121438
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 256
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Geophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC02‐05CH11231)
- National Science Foundation (AGS‐1540783, AGS‐1841559)
- Office of Naval Research (PISTON)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA13OAR310161, NA15OAR4310099)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Keywords
- Madden-Julian Oscillation, eastward propagation, time scales, tropical intraseasonal variability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review