Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity
Open accessAbstract
Studies of the impacts of solar geoengineering have mostly ignored tropospheric chemistry. By decreasing the sunlight reaching Earth's surface, geoengineering may help mitigate anthropogenic climate change, but changing sunlight also alters the rates of chemical reactions throughout the troposphere. Using the GEOS‐Chem atmospheric chemistry model, we show that stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) with sulfate, a frequently studied solar geoengineering method, can perturb tropospheric composition over a span of 10 years, increasing tropospheric oxidative capacity by 9% and reducing methane lifetime. SAI decreases the overall flux of shortwave radiation into the troposphere, but increases flux at certain UV wavelengths due to stratospheric ozone depletion. These radiative changes, in turn, perturb tropospheric photochemistry, driving chemical feedbacks that can substantially influence the seasonal and spatial patterns of radiative forcing beyond what is caused by enhanced stratospheric aerosol concentrations alone. For example, chemical feedbacks decrease the radiative effectiveness of geoengineering in northern high latitude summer by 20%. Atmospheric chemical feedbacks also imply the potential for net global public health benefits associated with stratospheric ozone depletion, as the decreases in mortality resulting from SAI‐induced improvements in air quality outweigh the increases in mortality due to increased UV radiation exposure. Such chemical feedbacks also lead to improved plant growth. Our results show the importance of including fuller representations of atmospheric chemistry in studies of solar geoengineering and underscore the risk of surprises from this technology that could carry unexpected consequences for Earth's climate, the biosphere, and human health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For the scenarios considered, stratospheric ozone was depleted by 5-15% depending on latitude, and the increased transmission of UV-B radiation caused a reduction of ambient ground-level ozone of about 1-3 ppbv.
“For the scenarios considered, stratospheric ozone was depleted by 5–15%, depending on latitude, and the increased transmission of UV-B radiation caused a reduction of ambient (ground-level) ozone of about 1–3 ppbv (parts per billion by volume, equal to ca 2 μg m−3 at sea level).”
The reduction of ambient ozone would avoid ca 67,000 premature deaths per year from its inhalation.
“However, the reduction of ambient ozone would avoid ca 67,000 premature deaths per year from its inhalation.”
Moch and colleagues estimated that globally the increase in UV-B radiation would cause an additional 950 premature deaths per year from skin cancer, and the increase in PM2.5 would lead to an additional 6400 premature deaths from air pollution.
“Moch and colleagues [69] estimated that globally the increase in UV-B radiation would cause an additional 950 premature deaths per year from skin cancer, and the increase in particulate matter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) would lead to an additional 6400 premature deaths from air pollution.”
Our re-evaluation supports the established view that increases in UV-B radiation lead to a detrimental net effect on human health, and is at odds with the suggestion by Moch et al. that stratospheric ozone depletion may have net benefits.
“Our re-evaluation supports the established view that the increases in UV-B radiation lead to a detrimental net effect on human health, and is at odds with the suggestion by Moch et al. [69] that stratospheric ozone depletion may have net benefits.”
Previous studies on health impacts of SAI due to air quality changes have either relied on more idealized modeling frameworks and/or simplified mortality estimation methods.
“Previous studies have looked into the health impacts of SAI due to air quality changes (Eastham et al., 2018; Visioni et al., 2020; Moch et al., 2023; Harding et al., 2024). These efforts have either relied on more idealized modeling frameworks and/or simplified mortality estimation methods.”
From Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling (2026) · cites this paper as Moch et al., 2023
Our use of CESM2(WACCM6) enables interactive coupling between aerosols, chemistry, and climate, unlike previous CTM studies that imposed stratospheric aerosols without capturing feedbacks on dynamics and transport.
“Unlike previous studies using CTMs (e.g., Eastham et al., 2018; Moch et al., 2023), which imposed stratospheric aerosols without capturing feedbacks on dynamics and transport, our use of CESM2(WACCM6) enables interactive coupling between aerosols, chemistry, and climate.”
From Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling (2026) · cites this paper as Moch et al., 2023
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 92 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Moch, J. M., Mickley, L. J., Eastham, S. D., Lundgren, E. W., Shah, V., Buonocore, J. J., Pang, J. Y. S., Sadiq, M., & Tai, A. P. K.
- Affiliations
- American Association For The Advancement of Science (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Moch, Jonathan M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- AGU Advances
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2023-09-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2576-604X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386957622
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AGU Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Harvard University
- Goddard Space Flight Center
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Keywords
- solar geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection, sulfate aerosols, tropospheric chemistry, chemical feedback, oxidative capacity, methane lifetime, stratospheric ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation, tropospheric photochemistry, radiative forcing, air quality, plant growth, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review