Cited by 11Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesModel Reduction and Neural Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data Assimilation in Chaotic Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Hammoud, Mohamad Abed El Rahman, Raboudi, Naila, Titi, Edriss S., Knio, Omar, Hoteit, Ibrahim·2024·Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Data assimilation (DA) plays a pivotal role in diverse applications, ranging from weather forecasting to trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles. A prime example is the widely used ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), which relies on the Kalman filter's linear update equation to correct each of the ensemble forecast member's state with incoming observations. Recent advancements have witnessed the emergence of deep learning approaches in this domain, primarily within a supervised learning framework. However, the adaptability of such models to untrained scenarios remains a challenge. In this study, we introduce a new DA strategy that utilizes reinforcement learning (RL) to apply state corrections using full or partial observations of the state variables. Our investigation focuses on demonstrating this approach to the chaotic Lorenz 63 and 96 systems, where the agent's objective is to maximize the geometric series with terms that are proportional to the negative root‐mean‐squared error (RMSE) between the observations and corresponding forecast states. Consequently, the agent develops a correction strategy, enhancing model forecasts based on available observations. Our strategy employs a stochastic action policy, enabling a Monte Carlo‐based DA framework that relies on randomly sampling the policy to generate an ensemble of assimilated realizations. Numerical results demonstrate that the developed RL algorithm performs favorably when compared to the EnKF. Additionally, we illustrate the agent's capability to assimilate non‐Gaussian observations, addressing one of the limitations of the EnKF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2023ms004178

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Albrecht S. V., 2023, Multi‐agent reinforcement learning: Foundations and modern approaches
  2. 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129〈2884:aeakff〉2.0.co;2 · DOI
  3. 10.3934/eect.2014.3.579 · DOI
  4. 10.1029/2022ms003123 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41467-022-28957-7 · DOI
  6. Bertsekas D., 2019, Reinforcement learning and optimal control
  7. 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101525 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/72.392253 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.617 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/qj.4116 · DOI
  12. 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60442-2 · DOI
  14. Glorot X., 2010, Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, 249
  15. 10.1109/TIT.2005.844072 · DOI
  16. 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0076.1 · DOI
  17. Hammoud M. A. E. R. Raboudi N. Titi E. S. Hoteit I. &Knio O.(2024a).Data assimilation in chaotic systems using deep reinforcement learning[Software].https://github.com/mhammoud115/DA-RL · DOI
  18. Hammoud M. A. E. R. Raboudi N. Titi E. S. Hoteit I. &Knio O.(2024b).Data assimilation in chaotic systems using deep reinforcement learning[Software].https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11186844 · DOI
  19. 10.1029/2022MS003051 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.physd.2011.04.021 · DOI
  21. Hoteit I., 2018, Data assimilation in oceanography: Current status and new directions, New frontiers in operational oceanography, 465
  22. 10.1175/2007MWR1927.1 · DOI
  23. 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126〈0796:DAUAEK〉2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1029/2023MS003774 · DOI
  25. 10.3934/dcdsb.2018153 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/CBO9780511802270 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/0278364913495721 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00459.x · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.physd.2007.02.014 · DOI
  31. Lillicrap T. P., 2015, Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 · arXiv
  32. 10.1256/qj.02.132 · DOI
  33. 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020〈0130:DNF〉2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. Lorenz E. N., 1996, Proceeding of seminar on predictability
  35. 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05068.1 · DOI
  36. Mnih V., 2016, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning, 1928
  37. Mnih V., 2013, Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 · arXiv
  38. 10.1038/nature14236 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0 · DOI
  40. Novati G., 2019, Proceedings of the 36th international conference on machine learning, 1
  41. 10.3402/tellusa.v56i5.14462 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/2014JD021776 · DOI
  43. 10.1256/qj.05.129 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/qj.4484 · DOI
  45. Raffin A., 2021, Stable‐baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22, 12348
  46. 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023825 · DOI
  47. Rodriguez E. G., 2021, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1257
  48. 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.19.avm-023 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1109/TIT.1971.1054717 · DOI
  50. Silver D., 2014, Proceedings of the 31st international conference on machine learning, 387
  51. 10.1175/jas-d-11-0332.1 · DOI
  52. Sutton R. S., 2018, Reinforcement learning, an introduction
  53. 10.1002/qj.49711347812 · DOI
  54. 10.1175/2009MWR2835.1 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Hammoud, M. A. E. R., Raboudi, N., Titi, E. S., Knio, O., & Hoteit, I.
Affiliations
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hoteit, Ibrahim
Venue
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Published
2024-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
ISSN
1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401412212
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Global Collaborative Research, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (CRG2020‐4336)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (REP/1/3268‐01‐01)
  • Qatar National Research Fund (S‐0207‐200290)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
data assimilation, deep reinforcement learning, chaotic systems, ensemble Kalman filter, Lorenz-63 system, Lorenz-96 system, state corrections, Monte Carlo ensemble, root mean square error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review