The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data Assimilation in Chaotic Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Data assimilation (DA) plays a pivotal role in diverse applications, ranging from weather forecasting to trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles. A prime example is the widely used ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), which relies on the Kalman filter's linear update equation to correct each of the ensemble forecast member's state with incoming observations. Recent advancements have witnessed the emergence of deep learning approaches in this domain, primarily within a supervised learning framework. However, the adaptability of such models to untrained scenarios remains a challenge. In this study, we introduce a new DA strategy that utilizes reinforcement learning (RL) to apply state corrections using full or partial observations of the state variables. Our investigation focuses on demonstrating this approach to the chaotic Lorenz 63 and 96 systems, where the agent's objective is to maximize the geometric series with terms that are proportional to the negative root‐mean‐squared error (RMSE) between the observations and corresponding forecast states. Consequently, the agent develops a correction strategy, enhancing model forecasts based on available observations. Our strategy employs a stochastic action policy, enabling a Monte Carlo‐based DA framework that relies on randomly sampling the policy to generate an ensemble of assimilated realizations. Numerical results demonstrate that the developed RL algorithm performs favorably when compared to the EnKF. Additionally, we illustrate the agent's capability to assimilate non‐Gaussian observations, addressing one of the limitations of the EnKF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- Albrecht S. V., 2023, Multi‐agent reinforcement learning: Foundations and modern approaches
- 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129〈2884:aeakff〉2.0.co;2 · DOI
- 10.3934/eect.2014.3.579 · DOI
- 10.1029/2022ms003123 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28957-7 · DOI
- Bertsekas D., 2019, Reinforcement learning and optimal control
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101525 · DOI
- 10.1109/72.392253 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.617 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.4116 · DOI
- 10.3934/dcds.2001.7.403 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60442-2 · DOI
- Glorot X., 2010, Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, 249
- 10.1109/TIT.2005.844072 · DOI
- 10.1175/AIES-D-22-0076.1 · DOI
- Hammoud M. A. E. R. Raboudi N. Titi E. S. Hoteit I. &Knio O.(2024a).Data assimilation in chaotic systems using deep reinforcement learning[Software].https://github.com/mhammoud115/DA-RL · DOI
- Hammoud M. A. E. R. Raboudi N. Titi E. S. Hoteit I. &Knio O.(2024b).Data assimilation in chaotic systems using deep reinforcement learning[Software].https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11186844 · DOI
- 10.1029/2022MS003051 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physd.2011.04.021 · DOI
- Hoteit I., 2018, Data assimilation in oceanography: Current status and new directions, New frontiers in operational oceanography, 465
- 10.1175/2007MWR1927.1 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126〈0796:DAUAEK〉2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2023MS003774 · DOI
- 10.3934/dcdsb.2018153 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511802270 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0278364913495721 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0870.1986.tb00459.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physd.2007.02.014 · DOI
- Lillicrap T. P., 2015, Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 · arXiv
- 10.1256/qj.02.132 · DOI
- 10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020〈0130:DNF〉2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Lorenz E. N., 1996, Proceeding of seminar on predictability
- 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05068.1 · DOI
- Mnih V., 2016, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning, 1928
- Mnih V., 2013, Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 · arXiv
- 10.1038/nature14236 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42256-020-00272-0 · DOI
- Novati G., 2019, Proceedings of the 36th international conference on machine learning, 1
- 10.3402/tellusa.v56i5.14462 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JD021776 · DOI
- 10.1256/qj.05.129 · DOI
- 10.1002/qj.4484 · DOI
- Raffin A., 2021, Stable‐baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22, 12348
- 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023825 · DOI
- Rodriguez E. G., 2021, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1257
- 10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.19.avm-023 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TIT.1971.1054717 · DOI
- Silver D., 2014, Proceedings of the 31st international conference on machine learning, 387
- 10.1175/jas-d-11-0332.1 · DOI
- Sutton R. S., 2018, Reinforcement learning, an introduction
- 10.1002/qj.49711347812 · DOI
- 10.1175/2009MWR2835.1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammoud, M. A. E. R., Raboudi, N., Titi, E. S., Knio, O., & Hoteit, I.
- Affiliations
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hoteit, Ibrahim
- Venue
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2024-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1942-2466 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401412212
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Global Collaborative Research, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (CRG2020‐4336)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (REP/1/3268‐01‐01)
- Qatar National Research Fund (S‐0207‐200290)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- data assimilation, deep reinforcement learning, chaotic systems, ensemble Kalman filter, Lorenz-63 system, Lorenz-96 system, state corrections, Monte Carlo ensemble, root mean square error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review