Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: Application to in situ hydrofracturing test

Ohtsu, Masayasu·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

An application of a moment tensor analysis to acoustic emission (AE) is studied to elucidate crack types and orientations of AE sources. In the analysis, simplified treatment is desirable, because hundreds of AE records are obtained from just one experiment and thus sophisticated treatment is realistically cumbersome. Consequently, a moment tensor inversion based on P wave amplitude is employed to determine six independent tensor components. Selecting only P wave portion from the full‐space Green's function of homogeneous and isotropic material, a computer code named SiGMA (simplified Green's functions for the moment tensor analysis) is developed for the AE inversion analysis. To classify crack type and to determine crack orientation from moment tensor components, a unified decomposition of eigenvalues into a double‐couple (DC) part, a compensated linear vector dipole (CLVD) part, and an isotropic part is proposed. The aim of the decomposition is to determine the proportion of shear contribution (DC) and tensile contribution (CLVD + isotropic) on AE sources and to classify cracks into a crack type of the dominant motion. Crack orientations determined from eigenvectors are presented as crack‐opening vectors for tensile cracks and fault motion vectors for shear cracks, instead of stereonets. The SiGMA inversion and the unified decomposition are applied to synthetic data and AE waveforms detected during an in situ hydrofracturing test. To check the accuracy of the procedure, numerical experiments are performed on the synthetic waveforms, including cases with 10% random noise added. Results show reasonable agreement with assumed crack configurations. Although the maximum error is approximately 10% with respect to the ratios, the differences on crack orientations are less than 7°. AE waveforms detected by eight accelerometers deployed during the hydrofracturing test are analyzed. Crack types and orientations determined are in reasonable agreement with a predicted failure plane from borehole TV observation. The results suggest that tensile cracks are generated first at weak seams and then shear cracks follow on the opened joints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/90jb02689

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Ohtsu, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1991-04-10
Volume
96
Issue
B4
Pages
6211-6221
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141340174
Cited by
331
References
5
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: Application to in situ hydrofracturing test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/90jb02689
The paper
Ohtsu, M. (1991). Simplified moment tensor analysis and unified decomposition of acoustic emission source: Application to in situ hydrofracturing test. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/90jb02689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.