The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: Centroid‐moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981
Abstract
Data from the Global Digital Seismograph Network were used to obtain ‘centroid‐moment tensor’ solutions using the method of Dziewonski et al. (1981). Results were obtained for 201 earthquakes ranging in seismic moment from 7×10 23 to 3×10 27 dyne‐cm. The wide dynamic range of the SRO/ASRO stations allows us to investigate, using the same algorithm, series of events among which the smallest and the largest may differ in moment by a factor as large as 1000. Among the events studied is a particularly interesting series, in January 1981, off the island of Honshu. The main shock was preceded by three foreshocks and followed by four aftershocks all falling within the range of our analysis. There is an indication that the source mechanism changes with the size of the event. Statistical analysis of the results for all earthquakes reveals that the half duration of shallow and intermediate events is approximated by 1.6×10−8 M 01/3. The shifts in origin time for deep‐focus earthquakes are indicative of the general complexity of these events, which depends only weakly on the seismic moment. The extreme departures from a double couple mechanism seem to depend both on the moment and on the focal depth. While for shallow earthquakes these departures decrease, from a maximum at about 10 25 dyne‐cm, with increasing moment, the reverse appears to be true with respect to deep‐focus earthquakes. Shallow earthquakes north of New Guinea and along the Solomon Islands show systematic and substantial departures from the double couple mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Depth of seismic coupling along subduction zones
Tichelaar, B. W., & Ruff, L. J. (1993) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/92jb02045 · Cited by 458
Ohtsu, M. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/90jb02689 · Cited by 331
Upper-mantle seismic discontinuities and the thermal structure of subduction zones
Vidale, J. E., & Benz, H. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/356678a0 · Cited by 205
Seismic coupling along the Chilean Subduction Zone
Tichelaar, B. W., & Ruff, L. J. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/91jb00200 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Dziewonski, A. M., & Woodhouse, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1983-04-10
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- B4
- Pages
- 3247-3271
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102645295
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: Centroid‐moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/jb088ib04p03247
- The paper
- Dziewonski, A. M., & Woodhouse, J. H. (1983). An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: Centroid‐moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb088ib04p03247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.