Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tropospheric nitrogen: A three‐dimensional study of sources, distributions, and deposition

Penner, J. E., Atherton, C. S., Dignon, J., Ghan, S. J., Walton, J. J., Hameed, S.·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

We simulate the global cycle of reactive nitrogen in a three‐dimensional model of chemistry, transport, and deposition. Our model is based on the Lagrangian tracer model described by Walton et al. [1988] and uses winds and precipitation fields calculated by the Livermore version of the NCAR Community Climate Model. The model includes the basic chemical reactions of NO, NO 2, and HNO 3. For this study, we use prescribed OH and O 3 concentrations and calculate the concentrations of NO, NO 2, and HNO 3 for a perpetual January and a perpetual July. The sources of reactive nitrogen due to fossil‐fuel combustion (22 Mt N/yr), lightning discharges (3 Mt N/yr), soil microbial activity (10 Mt N/yr), biomass burning (6 Mt N/yr), and the oxidation of N 2 O in the stratosphere (1 Mt N/yr) are included. Model‐predicted concentrations of NO, NO 2, and HNO 3 are compared to available measurements. In general, we find reasonable agreement between model predictions and measurements except for concentrations of HNO 3 in the remote Pacific. At these latter locations, we require a larger source of reactive nitrogen to fit the observations. This may be supplied by lightning discharges, although increasing this source degrades our agreement with measured HNO 3 abundances in the free troposphere. Alternatively, a local marine source could contribute to the measured abundances. Predictions for nitrate deposition by precipitation are within a factor of 2 of measured deposition rates in the northern hemisphere in the summer and in both seasons at remote locations. The model underpredicts nitrate deposition in winter in Europe, due primarily to the excessively strong winds generated by the general circulation model. Model simulations for NOx and HNO 3 surface mixing ratios from calculations including only the fossil‐fuel source, only natural sources, and all sources acting together, are compared. Anthropogenic sources have substantially increased the concentrations of NOx and HNO 3 throughout all continents during both January and July. Fossil‐fuel sources are responsible for most of this increase in the northern hemisphere, while both biomass burning and fossil‐fuel combustion contribute in the southern hemisphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/90jd02228

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Penner, J. E., Atherton, C. S., Dignon, J., Ghan, S. J., Walton, J. J., & Hameed, S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1991-01-20
Volume
96
Issue
D1
Pages
959-990
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168057463
Cited by
201
References
0
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tropospheric nitrogen: A three‐dimensional study of sources, distributions, and deposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/90jd02228
The paper
Penner, J. E., Atherton, C. S., Dignon, J., Ghan, S. J., Walton, J. J., & Hameed, S. (1991). Tropospheric nitrogen: A three‐dimensional study of sources, distributions, and deposition. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/90jd02228

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.