Cited by 212Geothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsRock Mechanics and Modelingearthquake and tectonic studies

The transition from hydrostatic to greater than hydrostatic fluid pressure in presently active continental hydrothermal systems in crystalline rock

Foumier, Robert O.·1991·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Fluid flow at hydrostatic pressure (P h) is relatively common through fractures in silicic and in mafic crystalline rocks where temperatures are less than about 350–370°C. In contrast, pore‐fluid pressure (P f) > P h has been encountered at the bottom of 3 geothermal exploration wells that attained temperatures >370°C (at Larderello, Italy, at Nesjavellir, Iceland, and at The Geysers, California). Chemical sealing by deposition of minerals in veins appears to have allowed the development of the high P f encountered in the above wells. The upper limit for the magnitude of P f that can be attained is controlled by either the onset of shear fracturing (where differential stress is relatively high) that reopens clogged veins, or the hydraulic opening of new or old fractures (at relatively low values of differential stress). The brittle‐plastic transition for silicic rocks can occur at temperatures as high as 370–400°C in tectonically active regions. In regions where high‐temperature geothermal systems develop and persist, it appears that either strain rates commonly are in the range 10−12 to 10−13, or that silicic rocks in the shallow crust generally behave rheologically more like wet quartz diorite than wet Westerly granite.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91gl00966

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-temperature geothermal wells located in North America include KS-13 at 1050 °C (Hawaii, United States), Wilson No. 1 at 400 °C (California, United States), H-8,11,12,26,27,29 at >380 °C (Los Humeros, Mexico), Prati-32 at 400 °C (Geysers, California, United States), and IID-14 at 400 °C (Imperial Valley, California, United States).

    “High-temperature geothermal wells located in North America include KS-13 at 1050 °C (Hawaii, United States),406 Wilson No. 1 at 400 °C (California, United States),407 H-8,11,12,26,27,29 at >380 °C (Los Humeros, Mexico),408 Prati-32 at 400 °C (Geysers, California, United States),409 and IID-14 at 400 °C (Imperial Valley, California, United States).410”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 12 · Cited by 212

Authors
Foumier, R. O.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Foumier, Robert O.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1991-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
955-958
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2059242440
Cited by
212
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
Keywords
hydrothermal systems, pore pressure, hydrostatic pressure, crystalline rocks, fracture flow, shear fracture, ductile-to-brittle transition, strain rate, high-temperature geothermal systems, Larderello, The Geysers, differential stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review