Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

No‐net‐rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL‐1

Argus, Donald F., Gordon, Richard G.·1991·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

We present NNR‐NUVEL1, a model of plate velocities relative to the unique reference frame defined by requiring no‐net‐rotation of the lithosphere while constraining relative plate velocities to equal those in global plate motion model NUVEL‐1 [DeMets et al., 1990]. Differences between NNR‐NUVEL1 and no‐net‐rotation plate motion model AM0‐2 [Minster and Jordan, 1978] are as large as 15 mm/yr. In NNR‐NUVEL1, the Pacific plate rotates in a right‐handed sense relative to the no‐net‐rotation reference frame at 0.67°/m.y. about 63°S, 107°E. This rotation nearly parallels, but is 32% slower than, the Pacific‐hotspot Euler vector of HS2‐NUVEL1, which is a global model of plate‐hotspot velocities constrained to consistency with NUVEL‐1 [Gripp and Gordon, 1990]. At Hawaii the Pacific plate moves relative to the no‐net‐rotation reference frame at 70 mm/yr, which is 25 mm/yr slower than the Pacific plate moves relative to the hotspots. Differences between NNR‐NUVEL1 and HS2‐NUVEL1 are described completely by a right‐handed rotation of 0.33°/m.y. about 49°S, 65°E. The 99% confidence ellipsoids for plate‐hotspot motion in model HS2‐NUVEL1 exclude the corresponding Euler vectors from model NNR‐NUVELl. Thus the no‐net‐rotation reference frame differs significantly from the hotspot reference frame. If the difference between reference frames is caused by motion of the hotspots relative to a mean mantle reference frame, then hotspots beneath the Pacific plate move with coherent motion towards the east‐southeast. Alternatively, the difference between reference frames may show that the uniform drag, no‐net‐torque reference frame, which is kinematically equivalent to the no‐net‐rotation reference frame, is based on a dynamically incorrect premise. Possible exceptions to the assumption of uniform drag include a net torque on the lithosphere due to attached subducting slabs and greater resistance to plate motion beneath continents than beneath oceans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91gl01532

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Argus, D. F., & Gordon, R. G.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
1991-11
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
2039-2042
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2059982963
Cited by
422
References
0
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No‐net‐rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL‐1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91gl01532
The paper
Argus, D. F., & Gordon, R. G. (1991). No‐net‐rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL‐1. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl01532

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.