Cited by 293earthquake and tectonic studiesGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaGNSS positioning and interference

Space Geodetic Observations of Nazca-South America Convergence Across the Central Andes

Norabuena, Edmundo, Leffler-Griffin, Lisa, Mao, Ailin, Dixon, Timothy, Stein, Seth, Sacks, I. Selwyn, Ocola, Leonidas, Ellis, Michael·1998·Science

Abstract

Space geodetic data recorded rates and directions of motion across the convergent boundary zone between the oceanic Nazca and continental South American plates in Peru and Bolivia. Roughly half of the overall convergence, about 30 to 40 millimeters per year, accumulated on the locked plate interface and can be released in future earthquakes. About 10 to 15 millimeters per year of crustal shortening occurred inland at the sub-Andean foreland fold and thrust belt, indicating that the Andes are continuing to build. Little (5 to 10 millimeters per year) along-trench motion of coastal forearc slivers was observed, despite the oblique convergence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.279.5349.358

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GPS data indicate 30-40 mm/yr present-day crustal shortening across the Andes.

    “GPS data indicate 30-40 mm yr -I present-day crustal shortening across the Andes”

    From Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates? (2000) · cites this paper as Norabuena et al., 1998

  • The uncertainties of present GPS data are large enough to allow alternative nonuniform interpretations of the velocity field.

    “The uncertainties of present GPS data are large enough to allow alternative (nonuniform) interpretations of the velocity field [Leffier et al., 1997;Norabuena et al., 1998].”

    From Crustal shortening in the Andes: Why do GPS rates differ from geological rates? (2000) · cites this paper as Norabuena et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norabuena, E., Leffler-Griffin, L., Mao, A., Dixon, T., Stein, S., Sacks, I. S., Ocola, L., & Ellis, M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • E. Norabuena, Instituto Geofisico del Peru, Apartado 3747, Lima 100, Peru, and Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA.
Corresponding author
Stein, Seth
Venue
Science
Published
1998-01-16
Volume
279
Issue
5349
Pages
358-362
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1494860090
Cited by
293
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
Keywords
plate motion rates, plate boundary deformation, subduction zone, foreland thrust belt, crustal shortening, Andean orogeny, oblique convergence, Peru, Bolivia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review