Cited by 138earthquake and tectonic studiesGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide

Seismic coupling along the Chilean Subduction Zone

Tichelaar, Bart W., Ruff, Larry J.·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Underthrusting at subduction zones can cause large earthquakes at shallow depths but is accommodated by aseismic creep below a certain depth. The maximum depth of the seismically coupled zone (or seismogenic zone) is a transition from unstable to stable sliding. We have determined the maximum depth of the coupled zone and its variability along the Chilean subduction zone. The maximum depth of seismic coupling is defined by the depth of large (M > 6) underthrusting earthquakes that have occurred at the downdip edge of the coupled plate interface. Earthquake depth is determined with omnilinear waveform inversion of long‐period P waves. The statistical uncertainty in the depth is estimated using bootstrapping. Omnilinear inversion formally accounts for the scaling incompatibility between the P waveforms and decreases the uncertainty in the depth estimate. We have found the depths of 27 earthquakes in the time period from 1961 to 1987. Seismic coupling in Chile extends down to 48–53 km. There is a resolvable change in the maximum depth of coupling around 28°S. The region immediately north of this latitude has a coupled zone that extends no deeper than 36–41 km, while south of this latitude coupling extends down to 48–53 km. This transition is not simply related to the oceanic lithospheric age and plate convergence rate but coincides with a change in several geophysical and geological phenomena. With respect to shallower (north) and deeper (south) coupling there is a change from a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91jb00200

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tichelaar, B. W., & Ruff, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1991-07-10
Volume
96
Issue
B7
Pages
11997-12022
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124190807
Cited by
138
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Keywords
seismic coupling, seismogenic zone, Chilean subduction zone, aseismic creep, earthquake depth, slab dip, trench sediments, oceanic basement, volcanic activity, plate convergence rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review