Seismic coupling along the Chilean Subduction Zone
Abstract
Underthrusting at subduction zones can cause large earthquakes at shallow depths but is accommodated by aseismic creep below a certain depth. The maximum depth of the seismically coupled zone (or seismogenic zone) is a transition from unstable to stable sliding. We have determined the maximum depth of the coupled zone and its variability along the Chilean subduction zone. The maximum depth of seismic coupling is defined by the depth of large (M > 6) underthrusting earthquakes that have occurred at the downdip edge of the coupled plate interface. Earthquake depth is determined with omnilinear waveform inversion of long‐period P waves. The statistical uncertainty in the depth is estimated using bootstrapping. Omnilinear inversion formally accounts for the scaling incompatibility between the P waveforms and decreases the uncertainty in the depth estimate. We have found the depths of 27 earthquakes in the time period from 1961 to 1987. Seismic coupling in Chile extends down to 48–53 km. There is a resolvable change in the maximum depth of coupling around 28°S. The region immediately north of this latitude has a coupled zone that extends no deeper than 36–41 km, while south of this latitude coupling extends down to 48–53 km. This transition is not simply related to the oceanic lithospheric age and plate convergence rate but coincides with a change in several geophysical and geological phenomena. With respect to shallower (north) and deeper (south) coupling there is a change from a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tichelaar and Ruff [1991] found locking depths in the range 36-53 km for the central and southern Andes.
“Tichelaar and Ruff [1991] studied earthquakes along the subduction interface for the central and southern Andes and found locking depths in the range 36-53 km.”
From Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data (1997) · cites this paper as Tichelaar and Ruff, 1991
Tichelaar and Ruff [1991] suggest that interplate thrust events south of the study area have rupture areas of about 10^4 km^2.
“Tichelaar and Ruff [1991] suggest that interplate thrust events south of our area have rupture areas -104 km 2.”
From Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data (1997) · cites this paper as Tichelaar and Ruff, 1991
Tichelaar and Ruff [1991] suggested that for 18°S to 24°S, south of the study area, the coupled zone extends at least to 43-48 km.
“Tichelaar and Ruff [1991 ] suggested that for 18øS to 24øS, south of our study area, the coupled zone extends at least to 43-48 km.”
From Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data (1997) · cites this paper as Tichelaar and Ruff, 1991
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120 · see citing works
Transform fault earthquakes in the North Atlantic: Source mechanisms and depth of faulting
Bergman, E. A., & Solomon, S. C. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib08p09027 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Short‐ and long‐term effects of GPS measured crustal deformation rates along the south central Andes
Khazaradze, G., & Klotz, J. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2002jb001879 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Constraints on present‐day shortening rate across the central eastern Andes from GPS data
Leffler, L., Stein, S., Mao, A., Dixon, T., Ellis, M. A., Ocola, L., & Sacks, I. S. (1997) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/97gl00770 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tichelaar, B. W., & Ruff, L. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-07-10
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- B7
- Pages
- 11997-12022
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124190807
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
- Keywords
- seismic coupling, seismogenic zone, Chilean subduction zone, aseismic creep, earthquake depth, slab dip, trench sediments, oceanic basement, volcanic activity, plate convergence rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review