The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A perturbation simulation of CO2 uptake in an ocean general circulation model
Open accessAbstract
The uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 by the ocean is simulated using a perturbation approach in a three‐dimensional global general circulation model. Atmospheric p CO 2 is prescribed for the period 1750–1990 using the combined Siple ice core and Mauna Loa records. For the period 1980 to 1989, the average flux of CO 2 into the ocean is 1.9 GtC/yr. However the bomb radiocarbon simulation of Toggweiler et al. (1989 b) shows that the surface to deep ocean exchange in this model is too sluggish. Hence the CO 2 uptake calculated by the model is probably below the actual value. The observed atmospheric increase in 1980 to 1989 is 3.2 GtC/yr, for a combined atmosphere‐ocean total of 5.1 GtC/yr. This is comparable to the estimated fossil CO 2 production of 5.4 GtC/yr, implying that other sources and sinks (such as from deforestation, enhanced growth of land biota, and changes in the ocean carbon cycle) must be approximately in balance. The sensitivity of the uptake to the gas exchange rate is small: a 100% increase in gas exchange rate gives only a 9.2% increase in cumulative oceanic uptake. Details of the penetration into different oceanic regions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean
Wanninkhof, R. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/92jc00188 · Cited by 4,737
Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean
Levitus, S. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i049p00962-02 · Cited by 3,078
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Orr, J. C., Fabry, V. J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S. C., Feely, R. A., Gnanadesikan, A., Gruber, N., Ishida, A., Joos, F., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04095 · Cited by 4,590
Self-citationFriedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., et al. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020 · Cited by 2,544
Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O'Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Le Quéré, C., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., et al. (2022) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022 · Cited by 1,285
Seasonal variation of CO 2 and nutrients in the high‐latitude surface oceans: A comparative study
Takahashi, T., Olafsson, J., Goddard, J. G., Chipman, D. W., & Sutherland, S. C. (1993) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/93gb02263 · Cited by 1,163
Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source
Oechel, W. C., Hastings, S. J., Vourlrtis, G., Jenkins, M., Riechers, G., & Grulke, N. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361520a0 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarmiento, J. L., Orr, J. C., & Siegenthaler, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-03-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- C3
- Pages
- 3621-3645
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101131858
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A perturbation simulation of CO2 uptake in an ocean general circulation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jc02849
- The paper
- Sarmiento, J. L., Orr, J. C., & Siegenthaler, U. (1992). A perturbation simulation of CO2 uptake in an ocean general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jc02849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.