The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The structure of the polar vortex
Abstract
Reconstruction of the Airborne Antarctic Ozone Experiment and Airborne Arctic Stratosphere Expedition aircraft constituent observations, radiative heating rate computations, and trajectory calculations are used to generate comparative pictures of the 1987 southern hemisphere (SH) late winter and 1989 northern hemisphere (NH) mid‐winter, lower stratospheric, polar vortices. Overall, both polar vortices define a region of highly isolated air, where the exchange of trace gases occurs principally at the vortex edge through erosional wave activity. Aircraft measurement showed that (1) between 50 and 100 mbar, horizontally stratified long‐lived tracers such as N 2 O are displaced downward 2–3 km on the cyclonic (poleward) side of the jet with the meridional tracer gradient sharpest at the jet core. (2) Eddy mixing rates, computed using parcel ensemble statistics, are an order of magnitude or more lower on the cyclonic side of the jet compared to those on the anticyclonic side. (3) Poleward zonal mean meridional flow on the anticyclonic side of the jet terminates in a descent zone at the jet core. Despite the similarities between the SH and NH winter vortices, there are important differences. During the aircraft campaign periods, the SH vortex jet core was located roughly 8°–10° equatorward of its NH counterpart after pole centering. As a result of the larger size of the SH vortex, the dynamical heating associated with the jet core descent zone is displaced further from the pole. The SH polar vortex can therefore approach radiative equilibrium temperatures over a comparatively larger area than the NH vortex. The subsequent widespread formation of polar stratospheric clouds within the much colder SH vortex core gives rise to the interhemispheric differences in the reconstructed H 2 O, NOy, ClO, and O 3, species which are affected by polar stratospheric clouds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history
Solomon, S. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900008 · Cited by 2,008
Staehelin, J., Harris, N. R. P., Appenzeller, C., & Eberhard, J. (2001) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000059 · Cited by 375
Interrelationships between mixing ratios of long‐lived stratospheric constituents
Plumb, R. A., & Ko, M. K. W. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/92jd00450 · Cited by 375
Lawrence, Z. D., Perlwitz, J., Butler, A. H., Manney, G. L., Newman, P. A., Lee, S. H., & Nash, E. R. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2020jd033271 · Cited by 313
Self-citationA “tropical pipe” model of stratospheric transport
Plumb, R. A. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/95jd03002 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoeberl, M. R., Lait, L. R., Newman, P. A., & Rosenfield, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-05-30
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- D8
- Pages
- 7859-7882
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013046258
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of the polar vortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jd02168
- The paper
- Schoeberl, M. R., Lait, L. R., Newman, P. A., & Rosenfield, J. E. (1992). The structure of the polar vortex. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd02168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.