The DOI matches its Crossref record; 171 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ozone trends: A review
Abstract
Ozone plays a very important role in our atmosphere because it protects any living organisms at the Earth's surface against the harmful solar UVB and UVC radiation. In the stratosphere, ozone plays a critical role in the energy budget because it absorbs both solar UV and terrestrial IR radiation. Further, ozone in the tropopause acts as a strong greenhouse gas, and increasing ozone trends at these altitudes contribute to climate change. This review contains a short description of the various techniques that provided atmospheric ozone measurements valuable for long‐term trend analysis. The anthropogenic emissions of substances that deplete ozone (chlorine‐ and bromine‐containing volatile gases) have increased from the 1950s until the second half of the 1980s. The most severe consequence of the anthropogenic release of ozone‐depleting substances is the “Antarctic ozone hole.” Long‐term observations indicate that stratospheric ozone depletion in the southern winter‐spring season over Antarctica started in the late 1970s, leading to a strong decrease in October total ozone means. Present values are only approximately half of those observed prior to 1970. In the Arctic, large ozone depletion was observed in winter and spring in some recent years. Satellite and ground‐based measurements show no significant trends in the tropics but significant long‐term decreasing trends in the northern and southern midlatitudes (of the order of 2–4% per decade in the period from 1970 to 1996 and an acceleration in trends in the 1980s). Ozone at northern midlatitudes decreased by −7.4±2% per decade at 40 km above mean sea level, while ozone loss was small at 30 km. Large trends were found in the lower stratosphere, −5.1±1.8% at 20 km and −7.3±4.6% at 15 km, where the bulk of the ozone resides. The possibility of a reduction in the observed trends has been discussed recently, but it is very hard to distinguish this from the natural variability. As a consequence of the Montreal Protocol process, the emissions of ozone‐depleting substances have decreased since the late 1980s. Chlorine is no longer increasing in the stratosphere, although the total bromine amount is still increasing. Considering anthropogenic emissions of substances that deplete ozone, the turnaround in stratospheric ozone trends is expected to take place in the coming years. However, anthropogenic climate change could have a large influence on the future evolution of the Earth's ozone shield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone
Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/249810a0 · Cited by 4,332
Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction
Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., & Shanklin, J. D. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/315207a0 · Cited by 3,520
Annular Modes in the Extratropical Circulation. Part I: Month-to-Month Variability*
Thompson, D. W. J., & Wallace, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1000:amitec>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,403
On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps
Hoskins, B. J., McIntyre, M. E., & Robertson, A. W. (1985) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49711147002 · Cited by 2,985
Stratosphere‐troposphere exchange
Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B., & Pfister, L. (1995) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/95rg02097 · Cited by 2,706
Radiative forcing and climate response
Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03436 · Cited by 2,241
Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history
Solomon, S. (1999) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg900008 · Cited by 2,008
Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere
Charney, J. G., & Drazin, P. G. (1961) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz066i001p00083 · Cited by 1,684
The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content
Crutzen, P. J. (1970) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49709640815 · Cited by 1,594
The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results
Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V., Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., DeBeek, R., Hoogen, R., Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., et al. (1999) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0151:tgomeg>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,371
Cited by
Anenberg, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Tong, D. Q., & West, J. J. (2010) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0901220 · Cited by 747
Yamamoto, A. L. C., Corrêa, M. D. P., Torres, R. R., Martins, F. B., & Godin-Beekmann, S. (2024) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43630-024-00594-7 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Staehelin, J., Harris, N. R. P., Appenzeller, C., & Eberhard, J.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-290
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W2095329169
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 171
- FWCI
- 16.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ozone trends: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/1999rg000059
- The paper
- Staehelin, J., Harris, N. R. P., Appenzeller, C., & Eberhard, J. (2001). Ozone trends: A review. Reviews of Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg000059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.