Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation

Dye, J. E., Baumgardner, D., Gandrud, B. W., Kawa, S. R., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Ferry, G. V., Chan, K. R., Gary, B. L.·1992·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Particle size and volume measurements obtained with the forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP), model 300 during January and February 1989 in the Airborne Arctic Stratospheric Experiment are presented and used to study processes important in the formation and growth of polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) particles. Comparisons of the observations with expected sulfuric acid droplet deliquescence suggest that in the Arctic a major fraction of the sulfuric acid droplets remain liquid until temperatures at least as low as 193 K. Arguments are presented to suggest that homogeneous freezing of the sulfuric acid droplets might occur near 190 K and might play a role in the formation of PSCs. The first suggestion of nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) particles appears near saturation ratios of HNO 3 with respect to NAT of 1 (about 195 K) as an enhancement, of the large particles on the tail of the sulfuric acid droplet size distribution. The major increases in number and volume indicative of the main body of the NAT cloud are not seen in these Arctic investigations until 191 to 192 K, which corresponds to an apparent saturation ratio of HNO 3 with respect to NAT of about 10, unlike the Antarctic where clouds were encountered at saturation ratios near 1. A decrease in the number of particles was observed in regions in which the airmass was denitrified, i.e. NOy, the sum of all reactive nitrogen species, was reduced. This was especially true for the larger particles on the upper tail of the sulfate size distribution. The loss of these largest particles supports the idea that denitrification may be the result of the preferential nucleation and growth of NAT on only the largest sulfate particles, which then sediment out of the airmass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91jd02740

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Dye, J. E., Baumgardner, D., Gandrud, B. W., Kawa, S. R., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Ferry, G. V., Chan, K. R., & Gary, B. L.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1992-05-30
Volume
97
Issue
D8
Pages
8015-8034
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979925313
Cited by
259
References
34
FWCI
22.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/91jd02740
The paper
Dye, J. E., Baumgardner, D., Gandrud, B. W., Kawa, S. R., Kelly, K. K., Loewenstein, M., Ferry, G. V., Chan, K. R., & Gary, B. L. (1992). Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd02740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.