The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Sudbury structure: Controversial or misunderstood?
Abstract
The origins of the Sudbury Structure and associated Igneous Complex have been controversial. Most models call for a major impact event followed by impact‐induced igneous activity, although totally igneous models are still being proposed. Much of the controversy is due, in our opinion, to a misunderstanding of the size of the original Sudbury Structure. By analogy with other terrestrial impact structures, the spatial distribution of shock features and Huronian cover rocks at the Sudbury Structure suggest that the transient cavity was ∼100 km in diameter, which places the original final structural rim diameter in the range of 150–200 km. Theoretical calculations and empirical relationships indicate that the formation of an impact structure of this size will result in ∼10 4 km 3 of impact melt, more than sufficient to produce a melt body the size of the Igneous Complex (present volume 4–8 × 10 3 km 3). For the Igneous Complex to be an impact melt sheet it must have a composition similar to that of the target rocks. Evidence for this has been presented previously for Sr and Nd isotopic data, which suggest a crustal origin. Here, we also present new evidence from least squares mixing models that the average composition of the Igneous Complex corresponds to a mix of Archean granite‐greenstone terrain, with possibly a small component of Huronian cover rocks. This is a geologically reasonable mix, based on the interpreted target rock geology and the geometry of melt formation in an impact event of this size. The Igneous Complex is differentiated, which is not a characteristic of previously studied terrestrial impact melt sheets. This can be ascribed, however, to its great thickness and slower cooling. That large impact melt sheets can differentiate has important implications for how the lunar samples and the early geologic history of the lunar highlands are interpreted. If this working hypothesis is accepted, namely, that both the Sudbury Structure and the Igneous Complex are impact in origin, then previous hybrid impact‐igneous hypotheses can be discarded and the Sudbury Structure can be studied specifically for the constraints it provides to large‐scale cratering and the formation of basin‐sized (multiring?) impact structures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SIC represents the differentiated impact-melt sheet within the impact structure.
“It is now widely accepted that the SIC represents the differentiated impact-melt sheet within the impact structure (Grieve et al. 1991;Dickin et al. 1999;Therriault et al. 2002).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve et al. 1991
Estimates of the apparent crater diameter at Sudbury are mostly in the ~150-200 km range, but some recent estimates range up to 260 km.
“Estimates of the apparent crater diameter are mostly in the ~150-200 km range (Stöffler et al. 1994;Grieve et al. 1991), but some recent estimates range up to 260 km (Tuchscherer and Spray 2002;Spray et al. 2004).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve et al. 1991
According to Turtle et al. (2005) definitions, the Grieve et al. (1991) diameter estimate and more recent estimates for Sudbury are more correctly estimates of apparent crater diameter and are greater than the original final crater diameter.
“According to the definitions of Turtle et al. (2005), the Grieve et al. (1991) diameter estimate, with its more northerly center within the Sudbury Basin, and more recent estimates (e.g., Grieve 1994;Deutsch et al. 1995;Tuchscherer and Spray 2002;Spray et al. 2004) would more correctly be an estimate of the apparent crater diameter at Sudbury and be greater than the original final crater diameter.”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve et al. (1991)
The ~150 km Sudbury estimate is apparently consistent with an earlier estimate of 150-200 km.
“This estimate is apparently consistent with an earlier estimate of 150-200 km (Grieve et al. 1991).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Grieve et al. 1991
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 101
- Avermann M. Geologische Kartierung in SW‐Levack Township Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die Untersuchung der kontaktmetamorphen Überprägung der Grundgebirgsgesceine durch den Sudbury Igneous Complex in SW‐ und Zentral‐Levack Township diploma thesis 70 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1988.
- Avermann M., 1991, The Onaping Formation of the Sudbury structure (Canada): An example of allochthonous impact breccias, Tectonophysics
- Bray J. V., 1972, Introduction, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 1
- Brockmeyer P. Geologische Kartierung der Sultana Property Sudbury Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die petrographische Untersuchung der Sudbury‐Breccie diploma thesis 101 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1986.
- Brockmeyer P. Petrographie Geochemie und Isotopenuntersuchungen an der Onaping‐Formation im Nordteil der Sudbury‐Struktur (Ontario Kanada) und ein Modell zur Genese der Struktur dissertation 228 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1990.
- Brockmeyer P., 1989, The origin of the breccias in the lower Onaping Formation, Sudbury Structure (Canada): Evidence from petrographic observations and Sr‐Nd isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 20th, 113
- Card K. D., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 25
- Cintala M. J., 1984, Energy partitioning during terrestrial impact events: Melt production and scaling laws (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 156
- Cintala M. J., 1991, Modeled and observed impact‐melt volumes: Potential implications for scaling relationships (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 217
- Cintala M. J., 1991, Differential scaling of cratering phenomena: Consequences for crater morphology (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 213
- Collins W. H., 1934, Life history of the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive (1): Petrogenesis, Trans. R. Soc. Can., 28, 123
- Croft S. K., 1981, Multi‐Ring Basins, 227
- Croft S. K., 1985, The scaling of complex craters, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 15th, 828
- Currie K. L. Geology and petrology of the Manicouagan resurgent caldera Quebec Can. Geol. Surv. Bull. 198 153 1972. · DOI
- Dence M. R., 1972, Meteorite impact craters and the structure of the Sudbury Basin, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 7
- 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90184-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(89)90035-6 · DOI
- Deutsch A., 1990, Sudbury again: New and old isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 282
- Deutsch A., 1991, On the significance of crater ages—New ages for Dellen (Sweden) and Araguainha (Brazil), Tectonophysics
- 10.1086/626999 · DOI
- Dietz R. S., 1972, Sudbury astrobleme, splash emplaced sub‐layer and possible cosmogenic ores, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 29
- 10.1139/e84-033 · DOI
- Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
- Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 57
- 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90101-D · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-663-01889-6_3 · DOI
- Eskola P., 1921, On volcanic necks in Lake Janisjarvi, Bull. Comm. Geol. Finl., 55, 3
- 10.1126/science.230.4724.436 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB083iB06p02737 · DOI
- French B. M., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 383
- 10.1007/BF02596768 · DOI
- 10.1029/90EO00154 · DOI
- 10.1139/e75-175 · DOI
- Giblin P. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 3
- Goodwin A. M., 1968, Archean protocontinental growth and early crustal history of the Canadian shield, Proc. Int. Geol. Congr., 23rd, 1, 69
- Goodwin A. M., 1970, The Abitibi orogenic belt, Pap. Geol. Surv. Can., 70, 1
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1617:PACOTI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.001333 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x · DOI
- 10.1029/JB083iB06p02761 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 1991, The terrestrial impact cratering record, Tectonophysics
- Grieve R. A. F., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 791
- Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring Basins, 37
- 10.1029/90EO00344 · DOI
- Hartmann W. K., 1980, The Lunar Highlands Crust, 155
- 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90212-5 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB083iB06p02799 · DOI
- 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
- Krogh T. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 431
- 10.2113/gsecongeo.74.3.590 · DOI
- Lakomy R. Geologische Kartierung der Trillabelle Property Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario/Kanada) und die petrographische Untersuchung der Footwall‐Breccie diploma thesis 135 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1986.
- Lakomy R. Petrographie Geochemie und Sr‐Nd‐Untersuchungen an der Footwall‐Breccie im Nordreil der Sudbury‐Struktur dissertation 165 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1989.
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
- Lakomy R., 1990, Distribution of impact induced phenomena in complex terrestrial impact structures: Implications for transient cavity dimensions (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 676
- Lange M. A., 1979, Impact melting early in lunar history, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 10th, 2707
- 10.1029/88EO01150 · DOI
- Lundquist G., 1963, Description of the soil map of Garleborg County, Arsb. Sver. Geol. Under., 42, 60
- Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process
- Milton D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 703
- Muir T. L., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 449
- Muir T. L., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 139
- Müller‐Mohr V. Geologische Kartierung im zentralen Teil von Levack Township Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die Untersuchung der Sudbury‐Breccie im Norden der Sudbury‐Struktur; Petrographie und Verbreitung entlang eines Profils in der North Range der Struktur diploma thesis 62 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1988.
- Müller‐Mohr V., 1991, Breccias in the basement of a deeply eroded impact structure‐Sudbury, Canada, Tectonphysics
- 10.2113/gsecongeo.74.6.1520 · DOI
- Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 533
- Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 235
- Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 253
- Naldrett A. J., 1986, Metaliogeny of Basic and Ultrabasic Rocks, 75
- 10.1126/science.227.4691.1161 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB083iB06p02789 · DOI
- Pattison E. F., 1979, The Sudbury sublayer, Can. Mineral., 17, 257
- Peredery W. V., 1972, Chemistry of fluidal glasses and melt bodies in the Onaping formation, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 49
- Peredery W. V., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 491
- Phinney W. C., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 771
- Pye E. G., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure
- Rao B. V., 1984, Crustal contamination of the sublayer, Sudbury igneous complex: A combined trace element and strontium isotope study, Misc. Pap. Ont. Geol. Surv., 121, 128
- Raykhlin A. I. Stratiform internal structure of thick sheet like impactite bodies (abstract) in Russian XX All‐Union Meteorite Conference 30–31 Tallinn U.S.S.R. 1987.
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01281.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7037(82)90006-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90273-N · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1630:ZOSMAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Robertson P. B., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 687
- Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 715
- Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering
- Rose R. R. Manicouagan Lake‐Mushalagan Lake area Quebec map Pap. Can. Geol. Surv. 55‐2 1955. · DOI
- Rousell D. H., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 83
- 10.1029/90EO00086 · DOI
- Schultz P. H., 1981, Multi‐Ring Basins
- Selivanovskaya T. V., 1987, Crystal fractionation of impact melts (in Russian), Meteoritika, 46, 128
- 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
- Shanks W. S., 1990, New developments in Sudbury geology (abstract), Meteorite impact on the early Earth, Lunar Planet. Inst. Contrib., 746, 46
- Simonds C. H., 1978, West Clearwater, Quebec impact structure, part I, Field geology, structure and bulk chemistry, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 9th, 2633
- Stevenson J. S., 1963, The upper contact phase of the Sudbury micropegmatite, Can. Mineral., 7, 413
- 10.1007/BF00894452 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-73452-6_25 · DOI
- Stöffler D., 1989, Sudbury, Canada: Remanent of the only multi‐ring (?) impact basin on Earth (abstract), Meteoritics, 24, 328
- Svenonius F., 1895, Geological investigations in Garleborg County (in Swedish), Arsb. Sver. Geol. Unders., 152, 54
- 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90182-H · DOI
- Wood C. A., 1976, Comparison of impact basins on Mercury, Mars and the Moon, Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf., 7th, 3629
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[1995:ALPALS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citationHarrison, T. M. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46687-9 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieve, R. A. F., Stöffler, D., & Deutsch, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1991-12-25
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- E5
- Pages
- 22753-22764
- ISSN
- 0148-0227
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review