Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Sudbury structure: Controversial or misunderstood?

Grieve, Richard A. F., Stöffler, Dieter, Deutsch, Alex·1991·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

The origins of the Sudbury Structure and associated Igneous Complex have been controversial. Most models call for a major impact event followed by impact‐induced igneous activity, although totally igneous models are still being proposed. Much of the controversy is due, in our opinion, to a misunderstanding of the size of the original Sudbury Structure. By analogy with other terrestrial impact structures, the spatial distribution of shock features and Huronian cover rocks at the Sudbury Structure suggest that the transient cavity was ∼100 km in diameter, which places the original final structural rim diameter in the range of 150–200 km. Theoretical calculations and empirical relationships indicate that the formation of an impact structure of this size will result in ∼10 4 km 3 of impact melt, more than sufficient to produce a melt body the size of the Igneous Complex (present volume 4–8 × 10 3 km 3). For the Igneous Complex to be an impact melt sheet it must have a composition similar to that of the target rocks. Evidence for this has been presented previously for Sr and Nd isotopic data, which suggest a crustal origin. Here, we also present new evidence from least squares mixing models that the average composition of the Igneous Complex corresponds to a mix of Archean granite‐greenstone terrain, with possibly a small component of Huronian cover rocks. This is a geologically reasonable mix, based on the interpreted target rock geology and the geometry of melt formation in an impact event of this size. The Igneous Complex is differentiated, which is not a characteristic of previously studied terrestrial impact melt sheets. This can be ascribed, however, to its great thickness and slower cooling. That large impact melt sheets can differentiate has important implications for how the lunar samples and the early geologic history of the lunar highlands are interpreted. If this working hypothesis is accepted, namely, that both the Sudbury Structure and the Igneous Complex are impact in origin, then previous hybrid impact‐igneous hypotheses can be discarded and the Sudbury Structure can be studied specifically for the constraints it provides to large‐scale cratering and the formation of basin‐sized (multiring?) impact structures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/91je02513

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. Avermann M. Geologische Kartierung in SW‐Levack Township Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die Untersuchung der kontaktmetamorphen Überprägung der Grundgebirgsgesceine durch den Sudbury Igneous Complex in SW‐ und Zentral‐Levack Township diploma thesis 70 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1988.
  2. Avermann M., 1991, The Onaping Formation of the Sudbury structure (Canada): An example of allochthonous impact breccias, Tectonophysics
  3. Bray J. V., 1972, Introduction, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 1
  4. Brockmeyer P. Geologische Kartierung der Sultana Property Sudbury Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die petrographische Untersuchung der Sudbury‐Breccie diploma thesis 101 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1986.
  5. Brockmeyer P. Petrographie Geochemie und Isotopenuntersuchungen an der Onaping‐Formation im Nordteil der Sudbury‐Struktur (Ontario Kanada) und ein Modell zur Genese der Struktur dissertation 228 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1990.
  6. Brockmeyer P., 1989, The origin of the breccias in the lower Onaping Formation, Sudbury Structure (Canada): Evidence from petrographic observations and Sr‐Nd isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 20th, 113
  7. Card K. D., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 25
  8. Cintala M. J., 1984, Energy partitioning during terrestrial impact events: Melt production and scaling laws (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 156
  9. Cintala M. J., 1991, Modeled and observed impact‐melt volumes: Potential implications for scaling relationships (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 217
  10. Cintala M. J., 1991, Differential scaling of cratering phenomena: Consequences for crater morphology (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 213
  11. Collins W. H., 1934, Life history of the Sudbury Nickel Irruptive (1): Petrogenesis, Trans. R. Soc. Can., 28, 123
  12. Croft S. K., 1981, Multi‐Ring Basins, 227
  13. Croft S. K., 1985, The scaling of complex craters, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 15th, 828
  14. Currie K. L. Geology and petrology of the Manicouagan resurgent caldera Quebec Can. Geol. Surv. Bull. 198 153 1972. · DOI
  15. Dence M. R., 1972, Meteorite impact craters and the structure of the Sudbury Basin, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 7
  16. 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90184-0 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0012-821X(89)90035-6 · DOI
  18. Deutsch A., 1990, Sudbury again: New and old isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 282
  19. Deutsch A., 1991, On the significance of crater ages—New ages for Dellen (Sweden) and Araguainha (Brazil), Tectonophysics
  20. 10.1086/626999 · DOI
  21. Dietz R. S., 1972, Sudbury astrobleme, splash emplaced sub‐layer and possible cosmogenic ores, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 29
  22. 10.1139/e84-033 · DOI
  23. Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
  24. Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 57
  25. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90101-D · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-663-01889-6_3 · DOI
  27. Eskola P., 1921, On volcanic necks in Lake Janisjarvi, Bull. Comm. Geol. Finl., 55, 3
  28. 10.1126/science.230.4724.436 · DOI
  29. 10.1029/JB083iB06p02737 · DOI
  30. French B. M., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 383
  31. 10.1007/BF02596768 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/90EO00154 · DOI
  33. 10.1139/e75-175 · DOI
  34. Giblin P. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 3
  35. Goodwin A. M., 1968, Archean protocontinental growth and early crustal history of the Canadian shield, Proc. Int. Geol. Congr., 23rd, 1, 69
  36. Goodwin A. M., 1970, The Abitibi orogenic belt, Pap. Geol. Surv. Can., 70, 1
  37. 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1617:PACOTI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  38. 10.1146/annurev.ea.15.050187.001333 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01288.x · DOI
  40. 10.1029/JB083iB06p02761 · DOI
  41. 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A807 · DOI
  42. Grieve R. A. F., 1991, The terrestrial impact cratering record, Tectonophysics
  43. Grieve R. A. F., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 791
  44. Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring Basins, 37
  45. 10.1029/90EO00344 · DOI
  46. Hartmann W. K., 1980, The Lunar Highlands Crust, 155
  47. 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90212-5 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/JB083iB06p02799 · DOI
  49. 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
  50. Krogh T. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 431
  51. 10.2113/gsecongeo.74.3.590 · DOI
  52. Lakomy R. Geologische Kartierung der Trillabelle Property Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario/Kanada) und die petrographische Untersuchung der Footwall‐Breccie diploma thesis 135 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1986.
  53. Lakomy R. Petrographie Geochemie und Sr‐Nd‐Untersuchungen an der Footwall‐Breccie im Nordreil der Sudbury‐Struktur dissertation 165 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1989.
  54. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. Lakomy R., 1990, Distribution of impact induced phenomena in complex terrestrial impact structures: Implications for transient cavity dimensions (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., 676
  56. Lange M. A., 1979, Impact melting early in lunar history, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 10th, 2707
  57. 10.1029/88EO01150 · DOI
  58. Lundquist G., 1963, Description of the soil map of Garleborg County, Arsb. Sver. Geol. Under., 42, 60
  59. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process
  60. Milton D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 703
  61. Muir T. L., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 449
  62. Muir T. L., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 139
  63. Müller‐Mohr V. Geologische Kartierung im zentralen Teil von Levack Township Sudbury‐Distrikt (Ontario Kanada) und die Untersuchung der Sudbury‐Breccie im Norden der Sudbury‐Struktur; Petrographie und Verbreitung entlang eines Profils in der North Range der Struktur diploma thesis 62 pp. Westfalische‐Wilhelms‐Univ. Münster 1988.
  64. Müller‐Mohr V., 1991, Breccias in the basement of a deeply eroded impact structure‐Sudbury, Canada, Tectonphysics
  65. 10.2113/gsecongeo.74.6.1520 · DOI
  66. Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 533
  67. Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 235
  68. Naldrett A. J., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 253
  69. Naldrett A. J., 1986, Metaliogeny of Basic and Ultrabasic Rocks, 75
  70. 10.1126/science.227.4691.1161 · DOI
  71. 10.1029/JB083iB06p02789 · DOI
  72. Pattison E. F., 1979, The Sudbury sublayer, Can. Mineral., 17, 257
  73. Peredery W. V., 1972, Chemistry of fluidal glasses and melt bodies in the Onaping formation, Spec. Pap. Geol. Assoc. Can., 10, 49
  74. Peredery W. V., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 491
  75. Phinney W. C., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 771
  76. Pye E. G., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure
  77. Rao B. V., 1984, Crustal contamination of the sublayer, Sudbury igneous complex: A combined trace element and strontium isotope study, Misc. Pap. Ont. Geol. Surv., 121, 128
  78. Raykhlin A. I. Stratiform internal structure of thick sheet like impactite bodies (abstract) in Russian XX All‐Union Meteorite Conference 30–31 Tallinn U.S.S.R. 1987.
  79. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb01281.x · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0016-7037(82)90006-0 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90273-N · DOI
  82. 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1630:ZOSMAT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  83. Robertson P. B., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 687
  84. Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 715
  85. Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering
  86. Rose R. R. Manicouagan Lake‐Mushalagan Lake area Quebec map Pap. Can. Geol. Surv. 55‐2 1955. · DOI
  87. Rousell D. H., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 83
  88. 10.1029/90EO00086 · DOI
  89. Schultz P. H., 1981, Multi‐Ring Basins
  90. Selivanovskaya T. V., 1987, Crystal fractionation of impact melts (in Russian), Meteoritika, 46, 128
  91. 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Shanks W. S., 1990, New developments in Sudbury geology (abstract), Meteorite impact on the early Earth, Lunar Planet. Inst. Contrib., 746, 46
  93. Simonds C. H., 1978, West Clearwater, Quebec impact structure, part I, Field geology, structure and bulk chemistry, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 9th, 2633
  94. Stevenson J. S., 1963, The upper contact phase of the Sudbury micropegmatite, Can. Mineral., 7, 413
  95. 10.1007/BF00894452 · DOI
  96. 10.1007/978-3-642-73452-6_25 · DOI
  97. Stöffler D., 1989, Sudbury, Canada: Remanent of the only multi‐ring (?) impact basin on Earth (abstract), Meteoritics, 24, 328
  98. Svenonius F., 1895, Geological investigations in Garleborg County (in Swedish), Arsb. Sver. Geol. Unders., 152, 54
  99. 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90182-H · DOI
  100. Wood C. A., 1976, Comparison of impact basins on Mercury, Mars and the Moon, Proc. Lunar Sci. Conf., 7th, 3629
  101. 10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[1995:ALPALS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grieve, R. A. F., Stöffler, D., & Deutsch, A.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
1991-12-25
Volume
96
Issue
E5
Pages
22753-22764
ISSN
0148-0227
Cited by
236
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review