Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon fluxes and burial rates over the continental slope and rise off central California with implications for the global carbon cycle

Reimers, Clare E., Jahnke, Richard A., McCorkle, Daniel C.·1992·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

In situ microelectrode, box‐core pore water gradient, and in situ benthic chamber estimates of organic carbon degradation and CaCO 3 dissolution are combined with organic‐C and carbonate‐C accumulation rates to approximate the total carbon flux to the seafloor along two transects of the continental slope and rise off central California. Microelectrode profiles of dissolved O 2 demonstrate that sediments at 13 sites, ranging in water depth from 580 to 4080 m, become anoxic below the uppermost 0.4–3 cm of the sediment column. If a current‐swept area of nondeposition on the upper slope is excluded, we find total organic‐C and carbonate‐C fluxes to the seafloor vary from 40 to 100 μmol C cm−2 yr−1 and from 32 to 91 μmol C cm−2 yr−1, respectively. From the distribution of these fluxes there is no indication that total fluxes or remineralization rates of organic or carbonate carbon are influenced markedly by conditions in the oxygen minimum zone. Instead, the upper continental rise with its system of submarine valleys and fans stands out as the most important locus for carbon deposition and remineralization. When benthic fluxes and burial rates are extrapolated over the whole slope and rise of the region, aerobic respiration is the major mechanism of organic matter oxidation, and organic‐C and carbonate‐C recycling are on average 87% and 98% efficient, respectively. These results suggest that modern sediments on the outer regions of continental margins are important sources of CO 2 that is injected directly into ocean deep water. However, if benthic carbon fluxes on the central California margin are typical of margins globally, this injection rate is less than 0.7 Gt C yr−1, which does not indicate a significant anthropogenic enhancement of carbon export to continental slopes and rises.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/92gb00105

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Reimers, C. E., Jahnke, R. A., & McCorkle, D. C.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1992-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
199-224
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W2007919618
Cited by
265
References
3
FWCI
17.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon fluxes and burial rates over the continental slope and rise off central California with implications for the global carbon cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92gb00105
The paper
Reimers, C. E., Jahnke, R. A., & McCorkle, D. C. (1992). Carbon fluxes and burial rates over the continental slope and rise off central California with implications for the global carbon cycle. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/92gb00105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.