Cited by 417Marine and coastal ecosystemsPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

The global ocean flux of particulate organic carbon: Areal distribution and magnitude

Jahnke, Richard A.·1996·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

The magnitude and distribution of the particulate organic carbon (POC) rain rate to the seafloor in the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Ocean basins between 61°N and 61°S has been estimated from benthic oxygen flux estimates (for water depths ≥ 1000 m only). The calculation utilizes the extensive data sets of sedimentary organic carbon, CaCO3, and accumulation rate to extrapolate between individual benthic flux measurement sites using an empirically‐derived correlation between the seafloor oxygen flux and these parameters. The POC flux through the 1000 m depth horizon was then estimated from published correlations between sediment trap‐determined fluxes and water depth. Total oxygen utilization in the deep ocean is estimated to be 1.2×1014 mol O2 yr−1, a value that agrees well with previous estimates which were based on surface water primary productivity, sediment trap, and depth relationships and with deep water respiration rates estimated from apparant oxygen utilization (AOU)‐14C relationships. On the basis of the derived global ocean flux distribution, it is concluded that (1) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) inputs are not required to account for estimated deep water respiration rates; (2) the majority of the POC input to the deep ocean occurs within 30° of the equator; (3) the proportion of primary production that reaches the deep sea does not vary greatly with latitude; (4) gyre and continental margin regions contribute roughly equally to the deep POC flux with a relatively…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/95gb03525

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These global estimates fall in the range of POC export production estimated from observations (3.5-20 GtC yr−1) and from simulations with other global carbon cycle models (8.5-15 GtC yr−1).

    “These global estimates fall in the range of POC export production estimated from observations (3.5-20 GtC yr−1) [Berger and Wefer, 1991; Jahnke, 1996] as well as that from simulations with other global carbon cycle models (8.5-15 GtC yr−1)”

    From Potential impact of climate change on marine export production (2001) · cites this paper as Jahnke, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jahnke, R. A.
Corresponding author
Jahnke, Richard A.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1996-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
71-88
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1985590580
Cited by
417
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Biogeochemical Cycles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
particulate organic carbon flux, deep ocean carbon cycle, benthic oxygen flux, apparent oxygen utilization, sediment trap flux, sediment organic carbon, calcium carbonate, sediment accumulation rates, dissolved organic carbon, equatorial divergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review