The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractionation of carbon isotopes by phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO2 levels
Abstract
Reports of the 13 C content of marine particulate organic carbon are compiled and on the basis of GEOSECS data and temperatures, concentrations, and isotopic compositions of dissolved CO 2 in the waters in which the related phytoplankton grew are estimated. In this way, the fractionation of carbon isotopes during photosynthetic fixation of CO 2 is found to be significantly correlated with concentrations of dissolved CO 2. Because ancient carbon isotopic fractionations have been determined from analyses of sedimentary porphyrins [Popp et al., 1989], the relationship between isotopic fractionation and concentrations of dissolved CO 2 developed here can be employed to estimate concentrations of CO 2 dissolved in ancient oceans and, in turn, partial pressures of CO 2 in ancient atmospheres. The calculations take into account the temperature dependence of chemical and isotopic equilibria in the dissolved‐inorganic‐carbon system and of air‐sea equilibria. Paleoenvironmental temperatures for each sample are estimated from re‐constructions of paleogeography, latitudinal temper‐ ature gradients, and secular changes in low‐latitude sea surface temperature. It is estimated that atmospheric partial pressures of CO 2 were over 1000 μatm 160–100 Ma ago, then declined to values near 300 μatm during the next 100 Ma. Analysis of a high‐resolution record of carbon isotopic fractionation at the Cenomanian‐Turonian boundary suggests that the partial pressure of CO 2 in the atmosphere was drawn down from values near 840 μatm to values near 700 μatm during the anoxic event.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C., & Garrels, R. M. (1983) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/ajs.283.7.641 · Cited by 2,428
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Thode, H. G., Shima, M., Rees, C. E., & Krishnamurty, K. V. (1965) · Canadian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1139/v65-076 · Cited by 121
Cited by
KAUFMAN, A., & KNOLL, A. (1995) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/0301-9268(94)00070-8 · Cited by 1,167
Interpreting carbon-isotope excursions: carbonates and organic matter
Kump, L. R., & Arthur, M. A. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00086-8 · Cited by 1,171
Hayes, J. M., Strauss, H., & Kaufman, A. J. (1999) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/s0009-2541(99)00083-2 · Cited by 843
Self-citationStanley, S. M., & Hardie, L. A. (1998) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/s0031-0182(98)00109-6 · Cited by 830
Effect of Phytoplankton Cell Geometry on Carbon Isotopic Fractionation
Popp, B. N., Laws, E. A., Bidigare, R. R., Dore, J. E., Hanson, K. L., & Wakeham, S. G. (1998) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00333-5 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, K. H., & Hayes, J. M.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-198
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1995007149
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractionation of carbon isotopes by phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO2 levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92gb00190
- The paper
- Freeman, K. H., & Hayes, J. M. (1992). Fractionation of carbon isotopes by phytoplankton and estimates of ancient CO2 levels. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/92gb00190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.