The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of gas exchange rate constants for a small stream on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee
Abstract
The steady state tracer gas method was used to determine gas exchange rate constants (k) for a small stream (annual average flow ≤1 m 3/min) draining the West Fork of Walker Branch watershed in eastern Tennessee. Chloride was used as a conservative tracer to account for dilution by lateral inflow, and propane and ethane were used as volatile tracers. Gas exchange rate constants for propane (kp) were about 100 d−1 over a wide range of flow conditions, while those for ethane (k e) were about 117 d 1; an equivalent rate constant for O 2 (KO 2) would be about 118–139 d−1, depending on the method used for its calculation. These rate constants are much larger than those typically found in rivers and large streams. Much lower k p values (about 50d−1) were found during one experiment conducted at low flow with much of the stream surface covered with floating leaves. Nineteen previously published empirical equations were used to predict kO2 values for one 72m stream reach; agreement between the predicted and measured values was generally very poor, underscoring the importance of field‐measured gas exchange rates in studies of the transport and fate of volatile compounds. Because ethane and propane have similar gas exchange rates and similar aqueous diffusion coefficients (k e/k p and D e/D p are both close to 1, where D is the compound's diffusion coefficient), accurate determination of the exponent n in the relationship ke/Kp− (D e/D p)n was not possible. The ratio k e/k p (1.17) is much closer to D e/D p (1.24) than to H e/H p (0.82, where H is the compound's Henry's law constant), suggesting that stripping of dissolved volatiles by air bubbles was not a dominant mode of gas exchange for the study stream.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inter-biome comparison of factors controlling stream metabolism
Mulholland, P. J., Fellows, C. S., Tank, J. L., Grimm, N. B., Webster, J. R., Hamilton, S. K., Martí, E., Ashkenas, L., Bowden, W. B., Dodds, W. K., et al. (2001) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00773.x · Cited by 481
Temperature and the metabolic balance of streams
DEMARS, B. O. L., RUSSELL MANSON, J., ÓLAFSSON, J. S., GÍSLASON, G. M., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, R., WOODWARD, G., REISS, J., PICHLER, D. E., RASMUSSEN, J. J., & FRIBERG, N. (2011) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02554.x · Cited by 273
Cook, P. G., Favreau, G., Dighton, J. C., & Tickell, S. (2003) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00087-8 · Cited by 262
Betts, E. F., & Jones, J. B. (2009) · Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research · doi:10.1657/1938-4246-41.4.407 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Genereux, D. P., & Hemond, H. F.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2365-2374
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2148692097
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of gas exchange rate constants for a small stream on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92wr01083
- The paper
- Genereux, D. P., & Hemond, H. F. (1992). Determination of gas exchange rate constants for a small stream on Walker Branch Watershed, Tennessee. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/92wr01083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.