Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physically based hydrologic modeling: 1. A terrain‐based model for investigative purposes

Grayson, Rodger B., Moore, Ian D., McMahon, Thomas A.·1992·Water Resources Research

Abstract

THALES, a simple distributed parameter hydrologic model is presented and applied to two catchments in Australia and the United States, each with different dominant hydrologic responses. The model simulates Hortonian overland flow and runoff from saturated source areas and is used to identify some of the barriers to modeling the hydrology of small catchments. At Wagga Wagga in New South Wales, Australia, runoff is produced from saturated source areas, whereas on the Lucky Hills catchments at Walnut Gulch in Arizona, Hortonian overland flow processes dominate. Simulations at Wagga Wagga are based on published parameters and field data measured as part of an intensive field program and result in a relatively poor fit of the outflow hydrographs for a series of storms. The simulated position and growth of saturated areas coincides with the limited available information, indicating that at least the gross effects of subsurface water movement are being represented. For the Lucky Hills catchments, the hydrographs at the catchment outlet and points within the catchment are simulated for a storm series. The results are highly dependent on the parameter values, which are poorly defined, highlighting the lack of measured field data and lack of methodology for the collection of data at a scale appropriate for such models. The model structure is also shown to have a major influence on the output. The influence of simulating surface flow as sheet flow or rill flow or through a series of ephemeral gullies, as well as the choice of the surface roughness parameter and antecedent soil water conditions, is shown to have a profound effect on the distributed flow depth and velocity predictions. By fitting model parameters, a simulation assuming Hortonian overland flow produced similar results at the catchment outlet to those based on partial area runoff. These results are of concern since it is common to calibrate and verify hydrologic models based on the accuracy with which the catchment outflow is predicted. The internal estimates of flow characteristics following such a calibration often provide the input to sediment and nutrient transport models. Models such as THALES produce an enormous amount of information and have the theoretical potential to provide a “universal” tool for the representation of hydrologic response. However, problems of verification and validation of such models are acute. These problems relate to the difficulty in measuring/deriving parameters a priori, measurement of the catchment response in sufficient detail for testing, and the validity of the fundamental assumptions and algorithms used in model development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/92wr01258

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. D., & McMahon, T. A.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
1992-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
2639-2658
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2044878555
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.