CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 339Water Governance and InfrastructureWater Resource Management and QualityEnvironmental Science and Water Management

Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile

Budds, Jessica·2009·Geoforum
DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As noted by Budds (2009), there are unaccountable possible differences between water quantities registered and regulated (at litres per second), extractive volumes reported, and actual use and extraction.

    “Secondly, and as noted in some detail by Budds (2009), there are unaccountable possible differences between water quantities registered and regulated (at litres per second), extractive volumes reported, and actual use and extraction.”

    From Contested value and an ethics of resources: Water, mining and indigenous people in the Atacama Desert, Chile (2016) · cites this paper as Budds (2009)

  • The application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems.

    “the application of the Water Code in the past has led to cases of water grabbing in favor of most productive uses and to the detriment of the local populations, especially indigenous groups, and ecosystems (Budds, 2009(Budds, , 2010(Budds, , 2020;;Yáñez and Molina, 2011;Prieto, 2015Prieto, , 2016;;Prieto et al., 2022).”

    From Water or mineral resource? Legal interpretations and hydrosocial configurations of lithium mining in Chile (2023) · cites this paper as Budds, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Budds, J.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Budds, Jessica
ORCID
Budds, Jessica
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
418-430
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008
OpenAlex
W2009247086
Cited by
339
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 14
FWCI
71.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Geoforum (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (PTA-026-27-0854)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
Keywords
water resources management, groundwater overexploitation, hydrological assessment, political ecology, groundwater modeling, water allocation, technocracy, neoliberalism, hydrosocial cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review