The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural network‐based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty
Abstract
Uncertainty due to spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity is an important issue in the design of reliable groundwater remediation strategies. Using groundwater management models based on a stochastic approach to groundwater flow, where the log‐hydraulic conductivity is represented as a random field, is a frequently studied technique for the design of aquifer remediation in the presence of uncertainty. Such an approach employs the solution of a management model for a large set of equally probable realizations of the hydraulic conductivity. However, only a few out of the large set of realizations are critical to the final outcome of the design. The spatial distribution of the hydraulic conductivity values in a realization, and the degree of variation of the hydraulic conductivity values within a realization are identified as two important features that determine the level of criticalness of a realization. The association between the hydraulic conductivity pattern and the level of criticalness is not known explicitly and needs to be captured for efficient screening. The screening approach presented here utilizes the pattern classification capability of a neural network and its ability to learn from examples. It is shown that incorporation of only a few critical realizations in a groundwater management model can yield highly reliable remediation designs. The application of the screening tool in a pump‐and‐treat design problem is illustrated via two examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Cited by
Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process
Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S. (1995) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/95wr01955 · Cited by 1,515
The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Water Quality Parameters
Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. (1996) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr03529 · Cited by 572
Global change and the groundwater management challenge
Gorelick, S. M., & Zheng, C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016825 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranjithan, S., Eheart, J. W., & Garrett, J. H.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 563-574
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W1989237559
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural network‐based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/92wr02129
- The paper
- Ranjithan, S., Eheart, J. W., & Garrett, J. H. (1993). Neural network‐based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/92wr02129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.