The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process
Abstract
An artificial neural network (ANN) is a flexible mathematical structure which is capable of identifying complex nonlinear relationships between input and output data sets. ANN models have been found useful and efficient, particularly in problems for which the characteristics of the processes are difficult to describe using physical equations. This study presents a new procedure (entitled linear least squares simplex, or LLSSIM) for identifying the structure and parameters of three‐layer feed forward ANN models and demonstrates the potential of such models for simulating the nonlinear hydrologic behavior of watersheds. The nonlinear ANN model approach is shown to provide a better representation of the rainfall‐runoff relationship of the medium‐size Leaf River basin near Collins, Mississippi, than the linear ARMAX (autoregressive moving average with exogenous inputs) time series approach or the conceptual SAC‐SMA (Sacramento soil moisture accounting) model. Because the ANN approach presented here does not provide models that have physically realistic components and parameters, it is by no means a substitute for conceptual watershed modeling. However, the ANN approach does provide a viable and effective alternative to the ARMAX time series approach for developing input‐output simulation and forecasting models in situations that do not require modeling of the internal structure of the watershed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks
Funahashi, K.-I. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90003-8 · Cited by 4,206
Cited by
Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. (2000) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(99)00007-9 · Cited by 2,377
Toward Improved Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Herrnegger, M., Sampson, A. K., Hochreiter, S., & Nearing, G. S. (2019) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2019wr026065 · Cited by 990
What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning?
Nearing, G. S., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Pelissier, C. S., Klotz, D., Frame, J. M., Prieto, C., & Gupta, H. V. (2021) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2020wr028091 · Cited by 894
Self-citationHong, Y., Hsu, K.-L., Sorooshian, S., & Gao, X. (2004) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/jam2173.1 · Cited by 851
Self-citationArtificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations
Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Aravena, R., & Bobée, B. (2001) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2000wr900368 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2517-2530
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2031292142
- Cited by
- 1,515
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95wr01955
- The paper
- Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S. (1995). Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/95wr01955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.