Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic

Holligan, Patrick M., Fernández, Emilio, Aiken, James, Balch, William M., Boyd, Philip, Burkill, Peter H., Finch, Miles, Groom, Stephen B., Malin, Gillian, Muller, Kerstin, Purdie, Duncan A., Robinson, Carol, Trees, Charles C., Turner, Suzanne M., van der Wal, Paul·1993·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

The biogeochemical properties of an extensive bloom (∼250,000 km 2) of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the north east Atlantic Ocean were investigated in June 1991. Satellite (NOAA‐AVHRR) imagery showed that the bloom was centered initially at 60°–63°N by 13°–28°W and lasted approximately 3 weeks. Spatial variations in satellite‐measured reflectance were well correlated with surface measurements of the beam attenuation coefficient, levels of particulate inorganic carbon, and coccolith density. Rates of both photosynthesis and calcification were typically relatively low within the coccolithophore‐rich waters, suggesting the population was in a late stage of development at the time of the field observations. Levels of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in surface waters were high compared to average ocean values, with the greatest concentrations in localized areas characterized by relatively high rates of photosynthesis, calcification, and grazing by microzooplankton. The estimated spatially averaged flux of DMS to the atmosphere was 1122 nmol m−2 h−1, somewhat greater than that determined for the same region in June‐July 1987. Coccolith production (1 × 10 6 tonnes calcite‐C) had a significant impact on the state of the CO 2 system, causing relative increases of up to 50 μatm in surface pCO 2 in association with alkalinity and water temperature changes. Gradients in pCO 2 were as great as 100 μatm over horizontal distances of 20–40 km. The environmental implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the spatial and temporal distributions of E. huxleyi.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/93gb01731

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Holligan, P. M., Fernández, E., Aiken, J., Balch, W. M., Boyd, P., Burkill, P. H., Finch, M., Groom, S. B., Malin, G., Muller, K., Purdie, D. A., Robinson, C., Trees, C. C., Turner, S. M., & van der Wal, P.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1993-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
879-900
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1983678147
Cited by
497
References
1
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93gb01731
The paper
Holligan, P. M., Fernández, E., Aiken, J., Balch, W. M., Boyd, P., Burkill, P. H., Finch, M., Groom, S. B., Malin, G., Muller, K., Purdie, D. A., Robinson, C., Trees, C. C., Turner, S. M., & van der Wal, P. (1993). A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/93gb01731

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.