The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic
Abstract
The biogeochemical properties of an extensive bloom (∼250,000 km 2) of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the north east Atlantic Ocean were investigated in June 1991. Satellite (NOAA‐AVHRR) imagery showed that the bloom was centered initially at 60°–63°N by 13°–28°W and lasted approximately 3 weeks. Spatial variations in satellite‐measured reflectance were well correlated with surface measurements of the beam attenuation coefficient, levels of particulate inorganic carbon, and coccolith density. Rates of both photosynthesis and calcification were typically relatively low within the coccolithophore‐rich waters, suggesting the population was in a late stage of development at the time of the field observations. Levels of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in surface waters were high compared to average ocean values, with the greatest concentrations in localized areas characterized by relatively high rates of photosynthesis, calcification, and grazing by microzooplankton. The estimated spatially averaged flux of DMS to the atmosphere was 1122 nmol m−2 h−1, somewhat greater than that determined for the same region in June‐July 1987. Coccolith production (1 × 10 6 tonnes calcite‐C) had a significant impact on the state of the CO 2 system, causing relative increases of up to 50 μatm in surface pCO 2 in association with alkalinity and water temperature changes. Gradients in pCO 2 were as great as 100 μatm over horizontal distances of 20–40 km. The environmental implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the spatial and temporal distributions of E. huxleyi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate
Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., & Warren, S. G. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/326655a0 · Cited by 4,305
Cited by
Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model
Moore, J. K., Doney, S. C., & Lindsay, K. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002220 · Cited by 889
Erez, J. (2003) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2113/0540115 · Cited by 555
Decreasing marine biogenic calcification: A negative feedback on rising atmospheric p CO 2
Zondervan, I., Zeebe, R. E., Rost, B., & Riebesell, U. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001321 · Cited by 332
Role of oceans as biogenic sources of selenium
Amouroux, D., Liss, P. S., Tessier, E., Hamren-Larsson, M., & Donard, O. F. X. (2001) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00370-3 · Cited by 139
Barker, S., Higgins, J. A., & Elderfield, H. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1238 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Holligan, P. M., Fernández, E., Aiken, J., Balch, W. M., Boyd, P., Burkill, P. H., Finch, M., Groom, S. B., Malin, G., Muller, K., Purdie, D. A., Robinson, C., Trees, C. C., Turner, S. M., & van der Wal, P.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 879-900
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W1983678147
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93gb01731
- The paper
- Holligan, P. M., Fernández, E., Aiken, J., Balch, W. M., Boyd, P., Burkill, P. H., Finch, M., Groom, S. B., Malin, G., Muller, K., Purdie, D. A., Robinson, C., Trees, C. C., Turner, S. M., & van der Wal, P. (1993). A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/93gb01731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.