The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Arctic source for the great salinity anomaly: A simulation of the Arctic ice‐ocean system for 1955–1975
Abstract
A fully prognostic Arctic ice‐ocean model is used to study the interannual variability of the sea ice during the period 1955–1975 and to explain the large variability of the ice extent in the Greenland and Iceland seas during the late 1960's. In particular, the model is used to test the conjecture of Aagaard and Carmack (1989) that the Great Salinity Anomaly (GSA) was a consequence of the anomalously large ice export in 1968. The objective here is to explore the high‐latitude ice‐ocean circulation changes due to wind field changes. In the simulations the ice extent in the Greenland Sea increased during the 1960's, reaching a maximum in 1968, as observed, and maxima in ice extent were always preceded by large pulses of ice export through the Fram Strait. The ice export event of 1968 was the largest in the simulation, being about twice as large as the average and corresponding to 1600 km 3 of excess fresh water. The simulated upper water column in the Greenland Sea has a salinity minimum in the fall of 1968, followed by very low winter salinities. The simulations suggest that, besides the above average ice export to the Greenland Sea, there was also fresh water export to support the larger than average ice cover. Three low‐salinity anomalies, which are created by the variability in ice production/melt, exited through the Fram Strait in 1963–1965, 1966, and 1967–1969, the later two events being associated with a net freshwater export of about 900 km 3.The total simulated freshwater input of 2500 km 3 to the Greenland Sea compares well with the estimated total freshwater excess of the GSA of about 2200 km 3 as it passed through the Labrador Sea (Dickson et al., 1988). Considering the uncertainties in the model, it is possible that the ice export could account for even larger portion of the freshwater excess. However, the main conclusion is that these model results show the origin of the GSA to be in the Arctic, as suggested by Aagaard and Carmack (1989) and support the view that the Arctic may play an active role in climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean
Levitus, S. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i049p00962-02 · Cited by 3,078
Cited by
Importance of ice‐ocean interactions for the global ocean circulation: A model study
Goosse, H., & Fichefet, T. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1999jc900215 · Cited by 484
“Great Salinity Anomalies” in the North Atlantic
Belkin, I. M., Levitus, S., Antonov, J., & Malmberg, S.-A. (1998) · Progress in Oceanography · doi:10.1016/s0079-6611(98)00015-9 · Cited by 454
Serreze, M. C., & Barry, R. G. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535888 · Cited by 385
Variability of Fram Strait ice flux and North Atlantic Oscillation
Kwok, R., & Rothrock, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/1998jc900103 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Häkkinen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-09-15
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- C9
- Pages
- 16397-16410
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973358988
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Arctic source for the great salinity anomaly: A simulation of the Arctic ice‐ocean system for 1955–1975. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jc01504
- The paper
- Häkkinen, S. (1993). An Arctic source for the great salinity anomaly: A simulation of the Arctic ice‐ocean system for 1955–1975. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jc01504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.