The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport
Abstract
Estimates of stratospheric age from observations of long‐lived trace gases with increasing tropospheric concentrations invoke the implicit assumption that an air parcel has been transported intact from the tropopical tropopause. However, because of rapid and irreversible mixing in the stratosphere, a particular air parcel cannot be identified with one that left the troposphere at some prior time. The parcel contains a mix of air with a range of transit times, and the mean value over this range is the most appropriate definition of age. The measured tracer concentration is also a mean over the parcel, but its value depends both on the transit time distribution and the past history of the tracer in the troposphere. In principle, only if the tropospheric concentration is increasing linearly can the age be directly inferred. We illustrate these points by employing both a one‐dimensional diffusive analog of stratospheric transport, and the general circulation model (GCM) of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). Within the limits of the GCM, we estimate the time over which tropospheric tracer concentrations must be approximately linear in order to determine stratospheric age unambiguously; the concentration of an exponentially increasing tracer is a function only of age if the growth time constant is greater than about 7 years, which is true for all the chlorofluorocarbons. More rapid source variations (for example, the annual cycle in CO 2) have no such direct relationship with age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simulation of secular trends in the middle atmosphere, 1950–2003
Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Kinnison, D. E., Boville, B. A., & Sassi, F. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007485 · Cited by 696
Kinnison, D. E., Brasseur, G. P., Walters, S., Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Sassi, F., Harvey, V. L., Randall, C. E., Emmons, L., Lamarque, J. F., et al. (2007) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2006jd007879 · Cited by 489
PLUMB, R. A. (2002) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II · doi:10.2151/jmsj.80.793 · Cited by 373
Self-citationA “tropical pipe” model of stratospheric transport
Plumb, R. A. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/95jd03002 · Cited by 309
Self-citationStratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis
Sun, H., Bourguet, S., Luan, L., & Keith, D. (2024) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, T. M., & Plumb, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-01-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- 1059-1070
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990735684
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93jd03192
- The paper
- Hall, T. M., & Plumb, R. A. (1994). Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/93jd03192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.