The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating modal abundances from the spectra of natural and laboratory pyroxene mixtures using the modified Gaussian model
Abstract
Spectra of samples containing multiple pyroxene components are explored as a function of modal abundance using the modified Gaussian model (MGM). The MGM, unlike other approaches, allows spectra to be analyzed directly, without the use of actual or assumed end‐member spectra and therefore holds great potential for remote applications. Quantitative understanding of the spectral characteristics of lithologies which include mixtures of two or more pyroxenes is fundamental to analyzing remotely acquired spectra of terrestrial and extra‐terrestrial targets. A series of mass fraction mixtures created from several different particle size fractions were analyzed with the MGM to quantify the properties of pyroxene mixtures as a function of both modal abundance and grain size. Results of this MGM analysis indicate that band centers, band widths, and relative band strengths of absorptions from individual pyroxenes in mixture spectra are largely independent of particle size. In addition, systematic changes in relative band strength as a function of modal abundance are observed, which yield particle size independent relationships that can be used to estimate modal abundances from the spectra of unknown samples. Spectra of natural samples exhibiting both zoned and exsolved pyroxenes are evaluated as examples of spectra likely to be measured from actual lithologies. Spectral properties of both pyroxene components are resolved in exsolved samples using the MGM, and modal abundances are accurately estimated to within 5–10% without predetermined knowledge of the end‐member spectra. In contrast, the spectra of samples exhibiting zoned compositions are consistent with one dominant pyroxene component. This single pyroxene component has anomalously wide absorption bands and appears to represent an average composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaffey, S. J. (1987) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb092ib02p01429 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Hyperspectral remote sensing of plant pigments
Blackburn, G. A. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl123 · Cited by 722
Bishop, J. L., Perry, K. A., Darby Dyar, M., Bristow, T. F., Blake, D. F., Brown, A. J., & Peel, S. E. (2013) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets · doi:10.1002/jgre.20066 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunshine, J. M., & Pieters, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1993-05-25
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- E5
- Pages
- 9075-9087
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132549322
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating modal abundances from the spectra of natural and laboratory pyroxene mixtures using the modified Gaussian model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93je00677
- The paper
- Sunshine, J. M., & Pieters, C. M. (1993). Estimating modal abundances from the spectra of natural and laboratory pyroxene mixtures using the modified Gaussian model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. https://doi.org/10.1029/93je00677
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.