The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colloid transport in unsaturated porous media
Abstract
This paper explores the significance of the gas‐water interface on colloid sorption and transport. Three types of common saturation conditions were simulated in packed sand columns: (1) a completely water‐saturated condition, (2) gas bubbles trapped by capillary forces as a nonwetting residual phase (15% gas), and (3) gas present as a continuous phase (46% gas), or in other words, a vadose zone situation. Different saturations provided different interfacial conditions. Two types of polystyrene latex particles (0.2 μm), hydrophilic and hydrophobic, were used in each of the three saturations. Relative surface hydrophobicity of latex particles was characterized by contact angle measurements. Each experiment was repeated five times. A total of 30 columns with good reproducible packing and gas content gave reproducible particle breakthrough curves. The retention of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic colloids increased with gas content of the porous medium. Colloids preferentially sorbed onto the gas‐water interface relative to the matrix surface. The degree of sorption increased with the increase of colloid surface hydrophobicity. The results validate and quantify direct microscopic scale visualization observations made in two‐dimensional pore network glass micromodels (Wan and Wilson, 1994). These findings suggest an additional mechanism for filtration and for particulate transport in the subsurface environment, whenever more than one fluid phase is present. The results also give clear evidence that the presence of inadvertently trapped residual gas could help explain the discrepancy between water‐saturated laboratory column experiments and related theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alimi, O. S., Farner Budarz, J., Hernandez, L. M., & Tufenkji, N. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05559 · Cited by 2,668
Microplastic Incorporation into Soil in Agroecosystems
Rillig, M. C., Ingraffia, R., & de Souza Machado, A. A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01805 · Cited by 721
Microplastics in the soil environment: Occurrence, risks, interactions and fate – A review
Xu, B., Liu, F., Cryder, Z., Huang, D., Lu, Z., He, Y., Wang, H., Lu, Z., Brookes, P. C., Tang, C., et al. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2019.1694822 · Cited by 656
Review on subsurface colloids and colloid-associated contaminant transport in saturated porous media
Kanti Sen, T., & Khilar, K. C. (2006) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2005.09.001 · Cited by 502
Physiological responses of garden cress (L. sativum) to different types of microplastics
Pignattelli, S., Broccoli, A., & Renzi, M. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138609 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Wan, J., & Wilson, J. L.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857-864
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2032021453
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colloid transport in unsaturated porous media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/93wr03017
- The paper
- Wan, J., & Wilson, J. L. (1994). Colloid transport in unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/93wr03017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.