The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling carbon biogeochemistry in agricultural soils
Abstract
An existing model of C and N dynamics in soils was supplemented with a plant growth submodel and cropping practice routines (fertilization, irrigation, tillage, crop rotation, and manure amendments) to study the biogeochemistry of soil carbon in arable lands. The new model was validated against field results for short‐term (1–9 years) decomposition experiments, the seasonal pattern of soil CO 2 respiration, and long‐term (100 years) soil carbon storage dynamics. A series of sensitivity runs investigated the impact of varying agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration. The tests were simulated for corn (maize) plots over a range of soil and climate conditions typical of the United States. The largest carbon sequestration occurred with manure additions; the results were very sensitive to soil texture (more clay led to greater sequestration). Increased N fertilization generally enhanced carbon sequestration, but the results were sensitive to soil texture, initial soil carbon content, and annual precipitation. Reduced tillage also generally (but not always) increased SOC content, though the results were very sensitive to soil texture, initial SOC content, and annual precipitation. A series of long‐term simulations investigated the SOC equilibrium for various agricultural practices, soil and climate conditions, and crop rotations. Equilibrium SOC content increased with decreasing temperatures, increasing clay content, enhanced N fertilization, manure amendments, and crops with higher residue yield. Time to equilibrium appears to be one hundred to several hundred years. In all cases, equilibration time was longer for increasing SOC content than for decreasing SOC content. Efforts to enhance carbon sequestration in agricultural soils would do well to focus on those specific areas and agricultural practices with the greatest potential for increasing soil carbon content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changes in organic carbon and nitrogen of Morrow plot soils under different treatments, 1904-1973
ODELL, R. T., MELSTED, S. W., & WALKER, W. M. (1984) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198403000-00005 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: Coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial
Stallard, R. F. (1998) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/98gb00741 · Cited by 829
Groffman, P. M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Fulweiler, R. W., Gold, A. J., Morse, J. L., Stander, E. K., Tague, C., Tonitto, C., & Vidon, P. (2009) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5 · Cited by 677
Abdalla, M., Hastings, A., Chadwick, D. R., Jones, D. L., Evans, C. D., Jones, M. B., Rees, R. M., & Smith, P. (2018) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.023 · Cited by 537
Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration
Lemus, R., & Lal, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910393 · Cited by 455
DNDC: A process-based model of greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils
Giltrap, D. L., Li, C., & Saggar, S. (2010) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.06.014 · Cited by 431
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Frolking, S., & Harriss, R.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-254
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2005790708
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling carbon biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94gb00767
- The paper
- Li, C., Frolking, S., & Harriss, R. (1994). Modeling carbon biogeochemistry in agricultural soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/94gb00767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.