The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Escarpment evolution on high‐elevation rifted margins: Insights derived from a surface processes model that combines diffusion, advection, and reaction
Abstract
Experiments with a surface processes model of large‐scale (1–1000 km) long‐term (1–100 m.y.) erosional denudation are used to establish the controls on the evolution of a model escarpment that is related to the rifting of a continent. The model describes changes in topographic form as a result of simultaneous short‐ and long‐range mass transport representing hillslope (diffusive) processes and fluvial transport (advection), respectively. Fluvial entrainment is modeled as a first‐order kinetic reaction which reflects the credibility of the substrate, and therefore the fluvial system is not necessarily carrying at capacity. One‐dimensional and planform models demonstrate that the principal controls on the evolution of an initially steep model escarpment are (1) antecedent topography/drainage; (2) the timescale (or equivalently a length scale) in the fluvial entrainment reaction; (3) the flexural response of the lithosphere to denudation; and (4) the relative efficiencies of the short‐ and long‐range transport processes. When rainfall and substrate lithology are uniform, a significant amount of discharge draining over the escarpment top causes it to degrade. Only when the top of the model escarpment coincides with a drainage divide can escarpment retreat occur for these conditions. An additional requirement for retreat of a model escarpment without decline is a long reaction time scale for fluvial entrainment. This corresponds to a substrate that is hard to detach by fluvial erosion, and therefore to fluvial erosion that is not transport limited. Continuous backtilting of an escarpment due to flexural isostatic uplift in response to denudational unloading helps maintain the scarp top as a divide. It is essential if the escarpment gradient is to be preserved during retreat in a uniform lithology. Low flexural rigidities promote steep and slowly retreating escarpments. For given rainfall and substrate conditions, the morphology of a retreating model escarpment is determined by the ratio of the short‐range diffusive and long‐range advective transport efficiencies. A low ratio (which is interpreted to correspond to a relatively arid climate and weathering‐limited conditions) promotes steep, sharp‐topped escarpments with straight main slopes, and escarpment retreat occurs over a wide range of height scales. A high ratio (interpreted to correspond to a more humid, temperate climate) produces a convex upper slope, and concave lower slope morphology and only major escarpments are predicted to preserve a high scarp gradient. Lithological contrasts in the model produce more complex morphologies and predict the formation of scarps crowned by an erosionally resistant caprock. However, resistant caprocks are not an essential requirement for model scarps to retreat. We conclude that the inferred controls and model behavior are both consistent with the present‐day morphology of rifted continental margins and with modern conceptual models of landscape evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BEVEN, K. J., & KIRKBY, M. J. (1979) · Hydrological Sciences Bulletin · doi:10.1080/02626667909491834 · Cited by 6,670
Cited by
Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts
Willett, S. D. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/1999jb900248 · Cited by 1,015
Implications of sediment‐flux‐dependent river incision models for landscape evolution
Whipple, K. X., & Tucker, G. E. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2000jb000044 · Cited by 687
The influence of climate on the tectonic evolution of mountain belts
Whipple, K. X. (2009) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo413 · Cited by 639
Introduction to Numerical Geodynamic Modelling
Gerya, T. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809101 · Cited by 461
Tucker, G. E., & Whipple, K. X. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2001jb000162 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Kooi, H., & Beaumont, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1994-06-10
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- B6
- Pages
- 12191-12209
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035207306
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Escarpment evolution on high‐elevation rifted margins: Insights derived from a surface processes model that combines diffusion, advection, and reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jb00047
- The paper
- Kooi, H., & Beaumont, C. (1994). Escarpment evolution on high‐elevation rifted margins: Insights derived from a surface processes model that combines diffusion, advection, and reaction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb00047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.