The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dust deposition in southern Nevada and California, 1984–1989: Relations to climate, source area, and source lithology
Abstract
Dust samples collected annually for 5 years from 55 sites in southern Nevada and California provide the first regional source of information on modern rates of dust deposition, grain size, and mineralogical and chemical composition relative to climate and to type and lithology of dust source. The average silt and clay flux (rate of deposition) in southern Nevada and southeastern California ranges from 4.3 to 15.7 g/m 2/yr, but in southwestern California the average silt and clay flux is as high as 30 g/m 2/yr. The climatic factors that affect dust flux interact with each other and with the factors of source type (playas versus alluvium), source lithology, geographic area, and human disturbance. Average dust flux increases with mean annual temperature but is not correlated to decreases in mean annual precipitation because the regional winds bring dust to relatively wet areas. In contrast, annual dust flux mostly reflects changes in annual precipitation (relative drought) rather than temperature. Although playa and alluvial sources produce about the same amount of dust per unit area, the total volume of dust from the more extensive alluvial sources is much larger. In addition, playa and alluvial sources respond differently to annual changes in precipitation. Most playas produce dust that is richer in soluble salts and carbonate than that from alluvial sources (except carbonate‐rich alluvium). Gypsum dust may be produced by the interaction of carbonate dust and anthropogenic or marine sulfates. The dust flux in an arid urbanizing area may be as much as twice that before disturbance but decreases when construction stops. The mineralogic and major‐oxide composition of the dust samples indicates that sand and some silt is locally derived and deposited, whereas clay and some silt from different sources can be far‐traveled. Dust deposited in the Transverse Ranges of California by the Santa Ana winds appears to be mainly derived from sources to the north and east.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tegen, I., Harrison, S. P., Kohfeld, K., Prentice, I. C., Coe, M., & Heimann, M. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd000963 · Cited by 593
Plant-soil Interactions in Deserts
Schlesinger, W. H., & Pilmanis, A. M. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005939924434 · Cited by 482
Lawrence, C. R., & Neff, J. C. (2009) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.02.005 · Cited by 391
Aeolian dust in Colorado Plateau soils: Nutrient inputs and recent change in source
Reynolds, R., Belnap, J., Reheis, M., Lamothe, P., & Luiszer, F. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.121094298 · Cited by 357
Self-citationDuniway, M. C., Pfennigwerth, A. A., Fick, S. E., Nauman, T. W., Belnap, J., & Barger, N. N. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2650 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Reheis, M. C., & Kihl, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-05-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D5
- Pages
- 8893-8918
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045999247
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dust deposition in southern Nevada and California, 1984–1989: Relations to climate, source area, and source lithology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/94jd03245
- The paper
- Reheis, M. C., & Kihl, R. (1995). Dust deposition in southern Nevada and California, 1984–1989: Relations to climate, source area, and source lithology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd03245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.