The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study
Abstract
We present a model of the dust cycle that successfully predicts dust emissions as determined by land surface properties, monthly vegetation and snow cover, and 6‐hourly surface wind speeds for the years 1982–1993. The model takes account of the role of dry lake beds as preferential source areas for dust emission. The occurrence of these preferential sources is determined by a water routing and storage model. The dust source scheme also explicitly takes into account the role of vegetation type as well as monthly vegetation cover. Dust transport is computed using assimilated winds for the years 1987–1990. Deposition of dust occurs through dry and wet deposition, where subcloud scavenging is calculated using assimilated precipitation fields. Comparison of simulated patterns of atmospheric dust loading with the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer satellite absorbing aerosol index shows that the model produces realistic results from daily to interannual timescales. The magnitude of dust deposition agrees well with sediment flux data from marine sites. Emission of submicron dust from preferential source areas are required for the computation of a realistic dust optical thickness. Sensitivity studies show that Asian dust source strengths are particularly sensitive to the seasonality of vegetation cover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospero, J. M., Ginoux, P., Torres, O., Nicholson, S. E., & Gill, T. E. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2000rg000095 · Cited by 2,977
Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the GOCART model
Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., & Lin, S. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd000053 · Cited by 2,167
Self-citationThe atmospheric input of trace species to the world ocean
Duce, R. A., Liss, P. S., Merrill, J. T., Atlas, E. L., Buat‐Menard, P., Hicks, B. B., Miller, J. M., Prospero, J. M., Arimoto, R., Church, T. M., et al. (1991) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/91gb01778 · Cited by 1,752
Coale, K. H., Johnson, K. S., Fitzwater, S. E., Gordon, R. M., Tanner, S., Chavez, F. P., Ferioli, L., Sakamoto, C., Rogers, P., Millero, F., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383495a0 · Cited by 1,479
Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil‐derived dust emission scheme
Marticorena, B., & Bergametti, G. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/95jd00690 · Cited by 1,409
Global climates since the last glacial maximum
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0947 · Cited by 1,368
Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development
Chadwick, O. A., Derry, L. A., Vitousek, P. M., Huebert, B. J., & Hedin, L. O. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/17276 · Cited by 1,303
Global distribution of UV‐absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data
Herman, J. R., Bhartia, P. K., Torres, O., Hsu, C., Seftor, C., & Celarier, E. (1997) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/96jd03680 · Cited by 1,133
Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits
(1987) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-05007-4 · Cited by 1,128
Iron-limited diatom growth and Si:N uptake ratios in a coastal upwelling regime
Hutchins, D. A., & Bruland, K. W. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31203 · Cited by 1,013
Cited by
The physics of wind-blown sand and dust
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 · Cited by 1,608
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
Self-citationDust cycle: An emerging core theme in Earth system science
Shao, Y., Wyrwoll, K.-H., Chappell, A., Huang, J., Lin, Z., McTainsh, G. H., Mikami, M., Tanaka, T. Y., Wang, X., & Yoon, S. (2011) · Aeolian Research · doi:10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,085
Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I
Huneeus, N., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., Griesfeller, J., Prospero, J., Kinne, S., Bauer, S., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011 · Cited by 1,074
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Metadata
- Authors
- Tegen, I., Harrison, S. P., Kohfeld, K., Prentice, I. C., Coe, M., & Heimann, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2002-11-09
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- D21
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985250047
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 12.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2001jd000963
- The paper
- Tegen, I., Harrison, S. P., Kohfeld, K., Prentice, I. C., Coe, M., & Heimann, M. (2002). Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
