The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Buoyancy sources for a large, unrooted mountain range, the Sierra Nevada, California: Evidence from xenolith thermobarometry
Open accessAbstract
Xenoliths hosted by Cenozoic volcanic flows and plugs from the Central Sierra Nevada and Eastern Sierra Nevada, Owens Valley, and Inyo Mountains were studied for petrography and thermobarometry. The Central Sierra Nevada suite consists of abundant lower crustal feldspathic granulites, garnet clinopyroxenites, and mantle‐derived peridotites and garnet websterites. Mafic crustal assemblages occur down to ∼65–70 km, although below 35–40 km, they are mainly in the eclogite facies. In contrast, the Eastern Sierra Region suites show peridotitic, pyroxenitic, and harzburgitic assemblages at depths of ≥35–40 km. They define an adiabat in PT space (T ∼ 1180–1250°C), suggesting the presence of the asthenospheric upper mantle close to the base of the crust. The ultramafic mantle rocks from the Central Sierra Nevada also define an adiabatic slope in PT space, possibly an artifact of side heating from the east. There is xenolith evidence that the Sierra Nevada lost about half of its original crust on the eastern side of the range. Regardless of the actual mechanism of crustal thinning, the loss of the eclogitic lowermost crust and replacement by peridotite in the eastern Sierra Nevada is a process accompanied by a substantial density decrease (>100 kg/m 3). Overall, if the mechanism of eclogitic lowermost crust removal is viable, there are enough buoyancy sources to explain topographic differences between the Sierra Nevada and the adjacent Basin and Range, assuming isostatic equilibrium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The volume and composition of melt generated by extension of the lithosphere
McKENZIE, D., & BICKLE, M. J. (1988) · Journal of Petrology · doi:10.1093/petrology/29.3.625 · Cited by 2,951
Uplift of the Central Andean Plateau and bending of the Bolivian Orocline
Isacks, B. L. (1988) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb093ib04p03211 · Cited by 1,113
Cited by
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6 · Cited by 5,691
Composition of the Continental Crust
Rudnick, R. L., & Gao, S. (2003) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/03016-4 · Cited by 3,413
Amphibole “sponge” in arc crust?
Davidson, J., Turner, S., Handley, H., Macpherson, C., & Dosseto, A. (2007) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g23637a.1 · Cited by 1,109
Kelemen, P. B., Hanghøj, K., & Greene, A. R. (2007) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/03035-8 · Cited by 1,015
Lee, C.-T. A., & Bachmann, O. (2014) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.02.044 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Ducea, M. N., & Saleeby, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-04-10
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- B4
- Pages
- 8229-8244
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120794222
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Buoyancy sources for a large, unrooted mountain range, the Sierra Nevada, California: Evidence from xenolith thermobarometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jb03452
- The paper
- Ducea, M. N., & Saleeby, J. B. (1996). Buoyancy sources for a large, unrooted mountain range, the Sierra Nevada, California: Evidence from xenolith thermobarometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jb03452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.