The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The tropospheric distribution and budget of ethane
Open accessAbstract
From about 1500 measurements of ethane in the remote troposphere the longitudinally and vertically averaged latitudinal and seasonal variability of ethane was derived. To improve the data coverage, several data sets from literature were included. There are only very few data sets available for the southern hemisphere. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of the average seasonal/latitudinal ethane profile is estimated to less than 30%. The global annually averaged ethane mixing ratio is 860 ppt. There is a strong interhemispheric gradient with an average north/south ratio of 3.5. Within the northern hemisphere there is an average gradient from the highest annual mean value of 2500 ppt around 65°N to about 600 ppt at the equator. In the southern hemisphere there is only a small gradient at low latitudes and at middle and high southern latitudes no significant gradient can be seen. In both hemispheres a significant seasonal cycle with highest mixing ratios in late winter is observed. The ethane source strength needed to balance the atmospheric budget of ethane is estimated to 15.5 Tg/yr, with most of the emissions in the northern hemisphere. An independent estimate of the sources indicate that most of the emissions are due to natural gas losses (6 Tg/yr) and biomass burning (6.4 Tg/yr). This is also compatible with the latitudinal and seasonal variation of the atmospheric ethane removal rates. However, these estimates have substantial uncertainties and it should be noted that the role of the biosphere for the atmospheric budget of ethane is presently not understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a two-dimensional global tropospheric model: model chemistry
Hough, A. M. (1991) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/90jd01327 · Cited by 169
Light nonmethane hydrocarbons in seawater
Plass‐Dülmer, C., Koppmann, R., Ratte, M., & Rudolph, J. (1995) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb02416 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Cited by
Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC): An Overview on Emission, Physiology and Ecology
Kesselmeier, J., & Staudt, M. (1999) · Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006127516791 · Cited by 1,879
Three‐dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation
Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y. J., Foreman‐Fowler, M., Jones, D. B. A., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Prather, M. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901006 · Cited by 910
Guenther, A. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00465-3 · Cited by 682
He, Z., Wang, X., Ling, Z., Zhao, J., Guo, H., Shao, M., & Wang, Z. (2019) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-8801-2019 · Cited by 292
Monks, S. A., Wilson, C., Emmons, L. K., Hannigan, J. W., Helmig, D., Blake, N. J., & Blake, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2017jd028112 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudolph, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-06-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D6
- Pages
- 11369-11381
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985209146
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tropospheric distribution and budget of ethane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd00693
- The paper
- Rudolph, J. (1995). The tropospheric distribution and budget of ethane. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.