Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle

Open access
Pham, M., Müller, J.‐F., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., Mégie, G.·1995·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

The global tropospheric distributions of seven important sulfur species were simulated with a global three‐dimensional chemistry‐transport model (IMAGES). Surface emission and deposition velocity maps were established for use as lower boundary conditions in the model. While anthropogenic SO 2 emissions are by far the largest sulfur source in the northern midlatitudes, reduced sulfur compounds, notably dimethyl sulfide (DMS) predominate over most remote areas. Simulations were performed for the present‐day (∼ 1985) atmosphere. The calculated distributions are compared with available observations. The model results are found to be generally within a factor of (at most) 2–3 of long‐term observations. Comparison with campaign measurements is more difficult, mostly due to the strong dependence of sulfur species concentrations on local meteorological conditions. The results, however, indicate the need for future model refinements, especially with respect to biogenic emission estimates and parameterization of cloud processes. A sensitivity study is presented to discuss the uncertainties of the results related to several parameters (the decoupling of wet scavenging and convective transport for soluble species, volcanoes emission and deposition velocities). Results are also discussed in terms of global budgets and related variables and processes. Around 125 Tg S/yr of non‐sea‐salt (nss) sulfur compounds (DMS, CS 2, H 2 S, COS, and SO 2) are injected into the atmosphere. The balance is mainly maintained by nss‐sulfates wet and dry deposition, and by SO 2 dry deposition (94% of total sulfur deposition). It is found that DMS oxidation represents the main contribution to SO 2 chemical production (80% of the chemical sources), and that the major sink of SO 2 is provided by in‐cloud oxidation (90% of the chemical sinks), under the assumption that all SO 2 incorporated into clouds is oxidized. The calculated annual wet deposition of sulfates reaches 3 g S m−2 yr−1 over Europe and North America, while it is usually lower than 0.5 g S m−2 yr−1 in remote parts of the world. Estimations for the global lifetimes are 0.9 day for DMS, 4 days for CS 2, 2.2 days for H 2 S, 0.6 day for SO 2, 0.18 day for DMSO, 6.1 days for MSA, and 4.7 days for nss‐sulfates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/95jd02095

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Pham, M., Müller, J. ‐., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Mégie, G.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1995-12-20
Volume
100
Issue
D12
Pages
26061-26092
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037568311
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd02095
The paper
Pham, M., Müller, J. ‐., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Mégie, G. (1995). A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02095

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.