The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle
Open accessAbstract
The global tropospheric distributions of seven important sulfur species were simulated with a global three‐dimensional chemistry‐transport model (IMAGES). Surface emission and deposition velocity maps were established for use as lower boundary conditions in the model. While anthropogenic SO 2 emissions are by far the largest sulfur source in the northern midlatitudes, reduced sulfur compounds, notably dimethyl sulfide (DMS) predominate over most remote areas. Simulations were performed for the present‐day (∼ 1985) atmosphere. The calculated distributions are compared with available observations. The model results are found to be generally within a factor of (at most) 2–3 of long‐term observations. Comparison with campaign measurements is more difficult, mostly due to the strong dependence of sulfur species concentrations on local meteorological conditions. The results, however, indicate the need for future model refinements, especially with respect to biogenic emission estimates and parameterization of cloud processes. A sensitivity study is presented to discuss the uncertainties of the results related to several parameters (the decoupling of wet scavenging and convective transport for soluble species, volcanoes emission and deposition velocities). Results are also discussed in terms of global budgets and related variables and processes. Around 125 Tg S/yr of non‐sea‐salt (nss) sulfur compounds (DMS, CS 2, H 2 S, COS, and SO 2) are injected into the atmosphere. The balance is mainly maintained by nss‐sulfates wet and dry deposition, and by SO 2 dry deposition (94% of total sulfur deposition). It is found that DMS oxidation represents the main contribution to SO 2 chemical production (80% of the chemical sources), and that the major sink of SO 2 is provided by in‐cloud oxidation (90% of the chemical sinks), under the assumption that all SO 2 incorporated into clouds is oxidized. The calculated annual wet deposition of sulfates reaches 3 g S m−2 yr−1 over Europe and North America, while it is usually lower than 0.5 g S m−2 yr−1 in remote parts of the world. Estimations for the global lifetimes are 0.9 day for DMS, 4 days for CS 2, 2.2 days for H 2 S, 0.6 day for SO 2, 0.18 day for DMSO, 6.1 days for MSA, and 4.7 days for nss‐sulfates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO)
Conrad, R. (1996) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.60.4.609-640.1996 · Cited by 1,751
Atmospheric Aerosols: Biogeochemical Sources and Role in Atmospheric Chemistry
Andreae, M. O., & Crutzen, P. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1052 · Cited by 1,644
The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005 · Cited by 1,010
Dentener, F., Kinne, S., Bond, T., Boucher, O., Cofala, J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Hoelzemann, J. J., Ito, A., et al. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-4321-2006 · Cited by 887
Metadata
- Authors
- Pham, M., Müller, J. ‐., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Mégie, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-12-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D12
- Pages
- 26061-26092
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037568311
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd02095
- The paper
- Pham, M., Müller, J. ‐., Brasseur, G. P., Granier, C., & Mégie, G. (1995). A three‐dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.