The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biogenic emissions in Europe: 1. Estimates and uncertainties
Open accessAbstract
Several biogenic volatile organic compound (VOC) emission algorithms have been used, together with meteorological data from the EMEP MSC‐W ozone model, to generate estimates of the emissions of isoprene from European forests and agricultural crops over several summer periods. The most up‐to‐date estimate combines the recently updated isoprene emission factors from the United States with available knowledge of European tree species and emission factors. In some cases these European emission factors are significantly different from their U.S. equivalents because of differences in the tree species represented within a forest classification, especially with regard to spruce genera and Mediterranean oak genera. The new estimates have resulted in an approximate factor of 2–3 increase in isoprene emissions from northern Europe but a factor of 2 decrease in isoprene estimates for southern Europe. Overall, European isoprene emissions are estimated to be about 4000 kt C yr−1, approximately 50–100% greater than previous estimates. Preliminary estimates are also made of the emissions of the so‐called OVOC (other VOC) from forests and of soil NOx emissions. All of these estimates of biogenic emissions are subject to considerable uncertainty, not least because of a lack of knowledge of the species coverage in most European countries and of the appropriate emission factors which should be applied. Factors of 5–10 uncertainty are not unlikely for episodic ozone calculations. The implications of these uncertainties for the results of control strategy evaluations for rural ozone in Europe are assessed in a companion paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Formation of Organic Aerosols from the Oxidation of Biogenic Hydrocarbons
HOFFMANN, T., ODUM, J. R., BOWMAN, F., COLLINS, D., KLOCKOW, D., FLAGAN, R. C., & SEINFELD, J. H. (1997) · Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005734301837 · Cited by 787
Organic atmospheric aerosols: Review and state of the science
Jacobson, M. C., Hansson, H. ‐., Noone, K. J., & Charlson, R. J. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1998rg000045 · Cited by 731
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe
Simpson, D., Winiwarter, W., Börjesson, G., Cinderby, S., Ferreiro, A., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Janson, R., Khalil, M. A. K., Owen, S., et al. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd02747 · Cited by 522
Self-citationAerosol modeling with CHIMERE—preliminary evaluation at the continental scale
Bessagnet, B., Hodzic, A., Vautard, R., Beekmann, M., Cheinet, S., Honoré, C., Liousse, C., & Rouil, L. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.034 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpson, D., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., & Steinbrecher, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1995-11-20
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- D11
- Pages
- 22875-22890
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136213129
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biogenic emissions in Europe: 1. Estimates and uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/95jd02368
- The paper
- Simpson, D., Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., & Steinbrecher, R. (1995). Biogenic emissions in Europe: 1. Estimates and uncertainties. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd02368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.