Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global net carbon exchange and intra‐annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model

Hunt, E. Raymond, Piper, Stephen C., Nemani, Ramakrishna, Keeling, Charles D., Otto, Ralf D., Running, Steven W.·1996·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

A generalized terrestrial ecosystem process model, BIOME‐BGC (for BIOME BioGeoChemical Cycles), was used to simulate the global fluxes of CO 2 resulting from photosynthesis, autotrophic respiration, and heterotrophic respiration. Daily meteorological data for the year 1987, gridded to 1° by 1°, were used to drive the model simulations. From the maximum value of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for 1987, the leaf area index for each grid cell was computed. Global NPP was estimated to be 52 Pg C, and global Rh was estimated to be 66 Pg C. Model predictions of the stable carbon isotopic ratio 13 C/12 C for C 3 and C 4 vegetation were in accord with values published in the literature, suggesting that our computations of total net photosynthesis, and thus NPP, are more reliable than Rh. For each grid cell, daily Rh was adjusted so that the annual total was equal to annual NPP, and the resulting net carbon fluxes were used as inputs to a three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model (TM2) using wind data from 1987. We compared the spatial and seasonal patterns of NPP with a diagnostic NDVI model, where NPP was derived from biweekly NDVI data and R h was tuned to fit atmospheric CO 2 observations from three northern stations. To an encouraging degree, predictions from the BIOME‐BGC model agreed in phase and amplitude with observed atmospheric CO 2 concentrations for 20° to 55°N, the zone in which the most complete data on ecosystem processes and meteorological input data are available. However, in the tropics and high northern latitudes, disagreements between simulated and measured CO 2 concentrations indicated areas where the model could be improved. We present here a methodology by which terrestrial ecosystem models can be tested globally, not by comparisons to homogeneous‐plot data, but by seasonal and spatial consistency with a diagnostic NDVI model and atmospheric CO 2 observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96gb01691

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, E. R., Piper, S. C., Nemani, R., Keeling, C. D., Otto, R. D., & Running, S. W.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
1996-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
431-456
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1966717358
Cited by
195
References
5
FWCI
18.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global net carbon exchange and intra‐annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96gb01691
The paper
Hunt, E. R., Piper, S. C., Nemani, R., Keeling, C. D., Otto, R. D., & Running, S. W. (1996). Global net carbon exchange and intra‐annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1029/96gb01691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.