Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermal and dynamical evolution of the upper mantle in subduction zones

Open access
Kincaid, Chris, Sacks, I. Selwyn·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

We present results from two‐dimensional (2‐D) numerical experiments on the thermal and dynamical evolution of the subducting slab and of the overlying mantle wedge for a range in subduction parameters. These include subduction rate and the age and rheology of both subducting and overriding plates. Experiments also consider the influence of slab forcing conditions (from purely kinematic to purely dynamic) on the evolution of both the slab and mantle wedge. One goal is to determine how different parameters control thermal evolution of the slab‐wedge interface, from just after subduction initiation up through roughly 500–600 km of subduction, where temperatures are approaching steady state. An additional goal is to define optimal conditions for the melting of slab sediments and crust. Results show slab surface temperatures (SSTs) depend strongly on subduction velocity, plate thermal structure, and upper mantle (or wedge) viscosity structure. Fast subduction beneath a thick (>70 km) overriding plate results in the coolest SSTs. Maximum SSTs are recorded as an early transient event for cases of slow subduction (<3 cm/yr) beneath young, thin lithosphere (<45 km). The latter result supports a model for melting of slab sediments, and possibly crust, early on in cases where young plates subduct beneath thin lithosphere, such as in the Cascades. Maximum wedge temperatures are recorded at higher subduction rates and are found to be strongly dependent on factors influencing return flow into the wedge, such as age of the overriding plate and the ratio of retrograde to longitudinal slab motion. Assuming a model for arc magma genesis driven by fluids migrating into the wedge, these results predict higher‐temperature, Mg‐rich melts coming up beneath subduction zones with fast, steep slabs and young overriding plates, such as in Japan. The influence of variable viscosity is most pronounced in the slab‐wedge corner, which tends to stagnate, or freeze out, with time. Moreover, a region of highly viscous mantle develops above the slab at intermediate depths (>100 km) which deflects the zone of maximum shear away from slab‐wedge interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jb03553

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Kincaid, C., & Sacks, I. S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1997-06-10
Volume
102
Issue
B6
Pages
12295-12315
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009307089
Cited by
256
References
2
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal and dynamical evolution of the upper mantle in subduction zones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jb03553
The paper
Kincaid, C., & Sacks, I. S. (1997). Thermal and dynamical evolution of the upper mantle in subduction zones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03553

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.