Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mantle discontinuity structure from midpoint stacks of converted P to S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track

Dueker, Kenneth G., Sheehan, Anne F.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Abstract

Analysis of a deployment of broadband sensors along a 500‐km‐long line crossing the Yellowstone hotspot track (YHT) has provided 423 in‐plane receiver functions with which to image lateral variations in mantle discontinuity structure. Imaging is accomplished by performing the converted wave equivalent of a common midpoint stack, which significantly improves resolution of mantle discontinuity structure with respect to single‐station stacks. Timing corrections are calculated from locally derived tomographic P and S wave velocity images and applied to the Pds (where d is the depth of the conversion) ray set in order to isolate true discontinuity topography. Using the one‐dimensional TNA velocity model and a V p/V s ratio of 1.82 to map our Pds times to depth, the average depths of the 410‐ and 660‐km discontinuities are 423 and 664 km, respectively, giving an average transition zone thickness of 241 km. Our most robust observation is provided by comparing the stack of all NW back‐azimuth arrivals versus all SE back‐azimuth arrivals. This shows that the transition zone thickness varies between 261 and 232 km, between the NW and SE portions of our line. More spatially resolved images show that this transition zone thickness variation results from the occurrence of 20–30 km of topography over 200–300 lateral scale lengths on the 410‐ and 660‐km discontinuities. The topography on the 410‐ and 660‐km discontinuities is not correlated either positively or negatively beneath the 600‐km‐long transect, albeit correlation could be present for wavelengths larger than the length of our transect. If this discontinuity topography is controlled exclusively by thermal effects, then uncorrelated 250° lateral temperature variations are required at the 410‐ and 660‐km discontinuities. However, other sources of discontinuity topography such as the effects of garnet‐pyroxene phase transformations, chemical layering, or variations in mantle hydration may contribute. The most obvious correlation between the discontinuity structure and the track of the Yellowstone hotspot is the downward dip of the 410‐km discontinuity from 415 km beneath the NW margin of the YHT to 435 km beneath the easternmost extent of Basin and Range faulting. Assuming this topography is thermally controlled, the warmest mantle resides not beneath the Yellowstone hotspot track, but 150 km to the SE along the easternmost edge of the active Basin and Range faulting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jb03857

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Dueker, K. G., & Sheehan, A. F.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
1997-04-10
Volume
102
Issue
B4
Pages
8313-8327
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975124229
Cited by
513
References
2
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mantle discontinuity structure from midpoint stacks of converted P to S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jb03857
The paper
Dueker, K. G., & Sheehan, A. F. (1997). Mantle discontinuity structure from midpoint stacks of converted P to S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb03857

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.