Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis

Open access
Chin, Mian, Jacob, Daniel J.·1996·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

A global three‐dimensional model is used to examine the export of anthropogenic sulfur from northern midlatitude continents and to assess the relative importance of anthropogenic and natural sources to sulfate levels in different regions of the troposphere. Model results indicate that about 40% of the anthropogenic sulfur emitted in the United States, Europe, or eastern Asia is exported out of the continental boundary layer of these regions; the rest is removed within the regions, primarily by dry deposition of SO 2 and wet deposition of SO 42−. Export is relatively more efficient in summer than in winter. There is little nonlinearity between the magnitude of sulfur emissions in the northern midlatitude continents and the export of this sulfur to the global atmosphere. Anthropogenic influence on SO 42− decreases rapidly with altitude because of efficient scavenging of SO 2 and SO 42− in deep convective updrafts. Thus it is found that anthropogenic influence accounts on average for less than 20% of SO 42− anywhere in the upper troposphere. The main source of SO 42− in the tropical upper troposphere in the model is from biogenic dimethylsulfide (DMS) pumped in deep convective events. Volcanic emissions account for 20–40% of SO 42− in much of the middle troposphere and for up to 80% over the North Pacific; they also represent a major contributor to SO 42− in the upper troposphere at high latitudes. On a global scale, it is estimated that anthropogenic, biogenic, and volcanic emissions account for 70%, 23%, and 7%, respectively, of the global sulfur source, but that they account for 37%, 42%, and 18%, respectively, of the global column of atmospheric SO 42−. The disproportionality between source and column contribution reflects the rapid deposition of anthropogenic SO 2 and SO 42− at low altitudes. It thus appears that the anthropogenic contribution to the SO 42− aerosol optical depth is much less than would be expected simply on the basis of emissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd01222

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Chin, M., & Jacob, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1996-08
Volume
101
Issue
D13
Pages
18691-18699
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046325291
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd01222
The paper
Chin, M., & Jacob, D. J. (1996). Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd01222

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.