The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis
Open accessAbstract
A global three‐dimensional model is used to examine the export of anthropogenic sulfur from northern midlatitude continents and to assess the relative importance of anthropogenic and natural sources to sulfate levels in different regions of the troposphere. Model results indicate that about 40% of the anthropogenic sulfur emitted in the United States, Europe, or eastern Asia is exported out of the continental boundary layer of these regions; the rest is removed within the regions, primarily by dry deposition of SO 2 and wet deposition of SO 42−. Export is relatively more efficient in summer than in winter. There is little nonlinearity between the magnitude of sulfur emissions in the northern midlatitude continents and the export of this sulfur to the global atmosphere. Anthropogenic influence on SO 42− decreases rapidly with altitude because of efficient scavenging of SO 2 and SO 42− in deep convective updrafts. Thus it is found that anthropogenic influence accounts on average for less than 20% of SO 42− anywhere in the upper troposphere. The main source of SO 42− in the tropical upper troposphere in the model is from biogenic dimethylsulfide (DMS) pumped in deep convective events. Volcanic emissions account for 20–40% of SO 42− in much of the middle troposphere and for up to 80% over the North Pacific; they also represent a major contributor to SO 42− in the upper troposphere at high latitudes. On a global scale, it is estimated that anthropogenic, biogenic, and volcanic emissions account for 70%, 23%, and 7%, respectively, of the global sulfur source, but that they account for 37%, 42%, and 18%, respectively, of the global column of atmospheric SO 42−. The disproportionality between source and column contribution reflects the rapid deposition of anthropogenic SO 2 and SO 42− at low altitudes. It thus appears that the anthropogenic contribution to the SO 42− aerosol optical depth is much less than would be expected simply on the basis of emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review
Haywood, J., & Boucher, O. (2000) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/1999rg000078 · Cited by 2,097
Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Yantosca, R. M., & Chin, M. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2003jd004473 · Cited by 987
Self-citationThree‐dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation
Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y. J., Foreman‐Fowler, M., Jones, D. B. A., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Prather, M. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901006 · Cited by 910
Chin, M., Rood, R. B., Lin, S., Müller, J., & Thompson, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900384 · Cited by 687
Self-citationA time‐averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions
(1998) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/98jd02091 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin, M., & Jacob, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- D13
- Pages
- 18691-18699
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046325291
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd01222
- The paper
- Chin, M., & Jacob, D. J. (1996). Anthropogenic and natural contributions to tropospheric sulfate: A global model analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd01222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.