Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 922

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances

Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M., Mattoo, S.·1997·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Spectral radiances measured at the top of the atmosphere in a wide spectral range (0.55–2.13 μm) are used to monitor the aerosol optical thickness and the aerosol size distribution (integrated on the vertical column) of the ambient (undisturbed) aerosol over the oceans. Even for the moderate resolution imaging spectrometer (MODIS) wide spectral range, only three parameters that describe the aerosol loading and size distribution can be retrieved. These three parameters are not always unique. For instance, the spectral radiance of an aerosol with a bilognormal size distribution can be simulated very well with a single lognormal aerosol with an appropriate mean radius and width of distribution. Preassumptions on the general structure of the size distribution are therefore required in the inversion of MODIS data. The retrieval of the aerosol properties is performed using lookup table computations. The volume size distribution in the lookup table is described with two lognormal modes: a single mode to describe the accumulation mode particles (radius <0.5 μm) and a single coarse mode to describe dust and/or salt particles (radius >1.0 μm). Note that two accumulation modes may be present, one dominated by gas phase processes and a second dominated by cloud phase processes. The coarse mode can also be split into several partially overlapping modes describing maritime salt particles and dust. The aerosol parameters we expect to retrieve are η, the fractional contribution of the accumulation mode to scattering; τ, the spectral optical thickness; and r m, the mean particle size of the dominant mode. Additional radiative quantities such as asymmetry parameter and effective radius are derived subsequently. The impact of the surface conditions, wind speed and chlorophyll content on the retrieval is estimated, the impact of potential sources of error like the calibration of the instrument is also tested. The algorithm has been applied successfully to actual data sets provided by the Thematic Mapper on Landsat 5 and by the MODIS airborne simulator on the ER‐2 and tested against ground and airborne measurements. A first estimate of the general accuracy is Δτ = ±0.05±0.05τ (at 550 nm), Δ r m= 0.3 r m, Δη = ±0.25.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/96jd03437

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 922

Metadata

Authors
Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M., & Mattoo, S.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
1997-07
Volume
102
Issue
D14
Pages
16971-16988
ISSN
0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040746851
Cited by
922
References
0
FWCI
18.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/96jd03437
The paper
Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M., & Mattoo, S. (1997). Remote sensing of aerosol properties over oceans using the MODIS/EOS spectral radiances. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd03437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.